Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.in-chemnitz.de!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have
 high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025
Date: 14 Dec 2024 20:04:33 GMT
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <ls66mhFprrqU8@mid.individual.net>
References: <hikplj9384rou0rmr2f8c6pmr0e09pcsi5@4ax.com>
	<ls42suFfeshU4@mid.individual.net>
	<ndmpljh9c3nljm6qltc2kelgs06u4f94ng@4ax.com> <4gf7P.5896$Uup4.1220@fx10.iad>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net NxbqV8oorOLA0CRoOLwf5Ac8zb3ApUULjXmH8WwL76T5XJuVLM
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tI0I7LE6A5q7HZkgJMe+9YdFotk= sha256:eY0wc8Tvok8ihKzzNGzUMLumGO4InV9Y6AXzAkSGDGs=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Bytes: 1431

On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:56:30 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:

> Higher performance per watt which leads to lower power use and therefore
> improved battery life. Whether Intel and AMD want to admit it or not,
> people _do_ want to have a computer which can handle a whole day's work
> on a single charge and which won't increase electrical bills.

My existing laptop is capable of that but I don't watch videos or play 
games in a day's work.