Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: RCS is not more private and secure than texting according to the
 FBI
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 17:13:11 +0100
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <lso7olFo80oU8@mid.individual.net>
References: <vjr55k$1cnf1$1@solani.org> <p8d83lxd5u.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
 <vjs73v$1053j$1@solani.org> <lseg87F71r1U5@mid.individual.net>
 <hqg93lxoaa.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <vjtt7c$10upe$1@solani.org>
 <vju0bu$27aaa$1@dont-email.me> <vk5s64$15bli$1@solani.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net hWWLzdTQffezduZP956u9gCjQ8bgqJKnBPxk1movDvyBp7N5bB
Cancel-Lock: sha1:to8tRQsuC2HXea3Jsg1Vp2FN/pg= sha256:7raJMLbDkqsRb5wzLKrTZVZRYpVqbnupslqj+R+Kllk=
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <vk5s64$15bli$1@solani.org>
Bytes: 1478

Jörg Lorenz, 2024-12-21 08:53:

> On 18.12.24 09:15, Alan wrote:
>> On 2024-12-17 23:22, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
>> No. Proprietary and encryption are NOT a contradiction.
>>
>> Don't argue from false positions.
> 
> You do not understand the concept of asymmetric secure end-to-end
> encryption. Those who own the service provide the encryption? Seriously?
> Naive to the max.

You know the meaning of end-to-end-encryption?


-- 
Arno Welzel
https://arnowelzel.de