Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: How quickly a bug gets fixed...
Date: 1 Jan 2025 02:29:08 GMT
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <ltjnjkF61fhU8@mid.individual.net>
References: <vqTbP.82759$DYF8.19890@fx14.iad> <vkvcpb$1rt3s$5@dont-email.me>
	<06IcP.24115$DPp5.21507@fx01.iad> <vl1rtk$2e5dv$2@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net CEGCT7bpfMkIgRf+j7QzkgrXeaWy1Ycz6Jk3nwuoD3VepjfSMD
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qVufk55kLB9pN9okuW1j0xypSvQ= sha256:y+XcnNZE6AzUCc7ZY4//Ua1IxQ29YOnWy5r19HESnmg=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Bytes: 1480

On Tue, 31 Dec 2024 17:40:53 -0500, DFS wrote:


> There are.  11 of the the Top 25 on distrowatch I looked at a few months
> ago had no code of conduct or DEI statement on their website (doing a
> cursory search)
> 
> MX Linux Mint EndeavourOS Pop!_OS Zorin CachyOS (tho the founder
> specified he/him pronouns)
> Garuda Sparky Tuxedo Kali EasyOS

I have Kali running in WSL. I like it but it's Debian with pentest tools 
conveniently packaged. Most of the rest are Debian based, or one step 
removed Ubuntu. EndeavourOS is Arch based and the Arch wiki claims 
politics aren't involved only technical merits. I'm not sure about EasyOS.

Does the one drop rule apply to Linux distros?