Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<ltktdnFc91tU1@mid.individual.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: groenveld@acm.org (John D Groenveld)
Newsgroups: misc.immigration.usa
Subject: MEDIA: The New Yorker Targets Border Hawk With Low Energy Hit Piece
Date: 1 Jan 2025 13:14:32 GMT
Organization: Groenveld.US
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <ltktdnFc91tU1@mid.individual.net>
X-Trace: individual.net Y+AiwktQuC3h4yPsB6gERQjLK67cJroEBBc6W2BTm8zr9mp7Wt
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mPYNqoRvrUDLGMy2w3oKmZRpgx8= sha256:OKhLcDcYZrYjjuV4fntQVLQpwp1Ma+ickptUNDXifAQ=
X-uri: <URL:http://www.groenveld.us/~john/>
Bytes: 2416

Border Hawk's Dan Lyman on whether Susie Wiles recommends that 
Donald Trump submit content to the BSky.SOCIAL website: 
<URL:https://borderhawk.news/new-yorker-targets-border-hawk-with-low-energy-hit-piece/>
| While the message conveyed by author Rachel Monroe (who apparently
| left X in favor of Bluesky shortly before publication) lacked some
| of the deeply insidious vitriol hurled at Border Hawk by the
| Southern Poverty Law Center earlier this year, the undertones
| rhymed.
| 
| "Border Hawk presents itself as a grassroots organization offering
| an honest view of the southern border. But the site is intimately
| entwined with a long-standing anti-immigrant movement that, until
| recently, was widely rejected," Monroe wrote.
| 
| "Border Hawk is a nonprofit, and cannot endorse political parties or
| candidates, but the site has consistently depicted the border as out
| of control, and migrants as criminals and invaders."
| 
| Monroe went on to besmirch the Lyman family, members of which
| founded and run the Border Hawk operation, as de facto anti-
| immigrant zealots whose defense of American laws and values are
| beyond the pale.

Has Trump ordered Wiles to share with VP JD Vance MAGA marketing 
research and does it suggest that taking a leftward position on the
National Question is a winner or a loser for the 2028 campaign for
WhiteHouse.GOV? 
John
groenveld@acm.org
-- 
""Hate speech" translates as anyone who is more interesting than you
(which is literally everyone) because you're a loser who succeeds by
making the world sterile and boring because those are the only
people who you can compete with." - Paul Joseph Watson
<URL:https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/1228594024296144896>