Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: Re: Looking Back: RI 2024
Date: 2 Jan 2025 03:50:14 GMT
Organization: loft
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <ltmgnmFk60oU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <ltjpo4F6r6iU1@mid.individual.net> <vl2e73$2kq3t$1@dont-email.me> <vl2mn9$2ln9q$2@dont-email.me> <vl5234$361gi$1@dont-email.me>
X-Trace: individual.net yCgo4INe9gYG7ZhngBJhxwv1lo7xFKUBPUcvq0T4IxlWHr+8pj
X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:i2qwyETrBI0SHjOEQ3aHfHxU9y4= sha256:CxDsqoUfHv75aiODNOh7hyS64KUaFHxDWhLFG0hQiOE=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)
Bytes: 1795

In article <vl5234$361gi$1@dont-email.me>,
Default User <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Bobbie Sellers wrote:
>
>> On 12/31/24 19:53, Lynn McGuire wrote:
>
>> > I am beginning to think that anything by Ilona Andrews is 6 stars
>> > out of  5 stars.  Even the Cinderella books (The Edge).  Their
>> > books are just  consistently good and rereadable (my definition of
>> > a 5 star book).
>
>> 	Despite your strange ideas, I have to agree with you about
>> the Illona Amdrews writing tem.
>
>I'm not quite as enamored with them as you two. The "Innkeeper " books
>were pretty good, other than the one that featured her sister off with
>the not-vampires. I find stories about those kind of honor-bound
>ritualistic societies IN SPACE to be tedious.

That was the best one!

How do you feel about the Liaden books?

>
>I have not read any other books as they didn't sound like the sort of
>thing I enjoy.
>

If they're not, they're not...
-- 
columbiaclosings.com
What's not in Columbia anymore..