Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: How did Einstein Develop his Field Equations? When: A. He
 admitted having little math
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 09:02:13 +0100
Lines: 154
Message-ID: <ltpjrdF3s91U11@mid.individual.net>
References: <11ed9ce5561647a339178272953d5c1a@www.novabbs.com>
 <676bf17f$0$29726$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
 <5428350c9c3bd960edf15ed389c83381@www.novabbs.com>
 <pVJGb-ClVe5kiUEoDG9Ij5bgBc0@jntp>
 <366cd907055651ec26e7a7e8478ca3eb@www.novabbs.com>
 <ltch7uF11cdU4@mid.individual.net>
 <74c17cfea441f868b1d86efc049a9d05@www.novabbs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net lDGBQgwJuAFiXNCKFEIsvAmJXKyDcCsoK6FehaBDD0+FhtMmDP
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XQqAuI0MgUfNbGl/T50H8bYBmGQ= sha256:K5P1UhVGBa5cLkh3R2/tNhSDdWzLvFeDJFRcmjbzrPI=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <74c17cfea441f868b1d86efc049a9d05@www.novabbs.com>
Bytes: 6171

Am Mittwoch000001, 01.01.2025 um 22:50 schrieb LaurenceClarkCrossen:
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 8:57:52 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
>> Am Freitag000027, 27.12.2024 um 00:37 schrieb LaurenceClarkCrossen:
>>> On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 23:18:50 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
>>>
>>>> Le 26/12/2024 à 22:52, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a 
>>>> écrit
>>>> :
>>>>> On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 11:50:23 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How did Einstein Develop his Field Equations?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When:
>>>>>>> A. He admitted having little math and no ability in non-Euclidean
>>>>>>> geometry.
>>>>>>> B. He always relied on someone else to do his math.
>>>>>>> C. He denied getting it from Hilbert.
>>>>>>> D. He never said who he got it from.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Answer:
>>>>>>> He stole them from Hilbert.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hilbert disagreed,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jan
>>>>> Hilbert did not disagree, as I have shown. Hilbert pointed out 
>>>>> Einstein
>>>>> didn't author the field equations because he could not.
>>>>
>>>> Einstein was a myth.
>>>>
>>>> As Muhammad and Saint Paul.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> R.H.
>>> Yes, Einstein was a fake. And as you said, "what theory?"
>>
>>
>> I had a similar idea long ago.
>>
>> I had studied Einstein life and his CV and found, that it didn't make
>> sense.
>>
>> E.g. Einstein's family lived in Munich, when young Albert was still a
>> kid.
>>
>> Then they moved to Italy and opened a new company there.
>>
>> But Albert stayed in Munich for some years alone, to attend school
>> there.
>>
>> But who would leave the eldest son alone in a different country??
>>
>> Then Albert left school, declined German citizenship and went to Pavia,
>> Italy, where his family lived at that time.
>>
>> He was about 16 years old and had to go to school in Italy.
>>
>> But apparently he didn't want, most likely he didn't speak Italian.
>>
>> So he stayed there for some time, without going to school, despite he
>> had to.
>>
>> Next door to the Einsteins in Pavia was a Jesuit facility. They write on
>> their website, that young Albert lived next door for a year (what I
>> actually believe).
>>
>> Now Albert went (alone again) to Aarau, Switzerland, to attend school
>> there.
>>
>> But since when was this allowed by the Swiss, who are/were not friendly
>> to foreigners (especially Germans) at all.
>>
>> Next to this Einstein went to the prestigious ETH in Zurich and studied
>> there.
>>
>> But that was even stranger, since he was actually a stateless alien.
>>
>> He became Swiss soon, what was also astonishing.
>>
>> Later he became an employee at the Swiss patent office.
>>
>> This was quite extraordinary, since such state owned facilities contain
>> usually secrets, which are usually kept away from foreigners.
>>
>> Therefore 'patent clerks' are usually 'Beamte', as sworn in employees of
>> the government are called in German.
>>
>> That kind of status was usually only available for born citizens.
>>
>>
>> Much mare convincing would be an alternative explanation of his life:
>>
>> he WAS Swiss from birth and his CV was a fake.
>>
>> This would also fit to his (apparent) ability to speak French fluently.
>>
>> This is not well known, but many people spoke French, to which Einstein
>> had contact (possibly friendship).
>>
>> This were, for instance:
>>
>> Marie Curie
>> George LeMaitre
>> Henry Poincare
>> Langvin
>>
>> He also attended the 'Solveig conference', which was held in French.
>>
>> Therefore 'Swiss' would be a relatively good bet.
>>
>>
>> TH
> Thanks, as that is all fascinating. I also regard relativity as fake,
> primarily because it pretends to explain causation without actually
> doing so.


Another interesting topic is language.

There exist several translations and if you compare the English and the 
German version, you will find, that the German version is somehow 
'weaker' and the English better written and not always similar in the 
content.

A good bet would be, that Einstein wasn't the author of 'On the 
electrodynamics of moving bodies' and that was actually written by 
somebody unknown in a different language.

It is, of course, very difficult to explain the weakness of Einstein's 
langugage to someone, who is not a native speaker of German and also 
fluent speaker in English.

You also need to understand the topic and need to have incentive to 
compare both versions.

So, more or less nobody did that so far.

But I'm doing this and compare both versions from a linguistic perspective.

And I have the impression, that this text is actually a translation, 
possibly from French or English, hence Einstein wasn't the real author.

This 'impression' is more a 'feeling' and difficult to explain. It has 
to do with language and how German is contracted and what is good German 
and what is not.


TH