Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1
Date: 4 Jan 2025 06:41:21 GMT
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <lts3ghFghgcU9@mid.individual.net>
References: <vkjmdg$30kff$1@dont-email.me>
	<441smjp44l5o2ja4c1vlsv32oh2j6m9n4j@4ax.com>
	<CoubP.49797$DPl.41452@fx13.iad>
	<pan$4da7a$f7b58970$926e1064$15cef996@linux.rocks>
	<4f7tmjplbte7cnuh2pqrh1fufs4iatv3fd@4ax.com>
	<f6GcnYUuyu7qFfL6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<ubb0nj5ioc4r3gbqhmmiprdejtefj1j6mm@4ax.com> <67707879@news.ausics.net>
	<edc3cd22-5cbb-bb81-70e4-321c53d62162@example.net>
	<VibcP.22228$VnJ1.12797@fx44.iad>
	<a092fd3e-df3f-6c16-fc67-50321ba67dd1@example.net>
	<YNycP.37866$vfee.30336@fx45.iad>
	<366b4ad1-4849-d7a9-cade-67d1eba035c3@example.net>
	<gJScP.13176$XfF8.10959@fx04.iad> <FEYcP.131275$aTp4.70494@fx09.iad>
	<35a09fa5-08b1-8121-51c7-28d3aac1cd0f@example.net>
	<ltlqktFgobaU2@mid.individual.net> <vl5p5a$39pj4$2@dont-email.me>
	<2797de8b-90fd-0aee-aeb8-f4233722fad7@example.net>
	<htSdnY3x04W6GOr6nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<9f11113b-af7c-f832-2caa-845133619ce6@example.net>
	<20250103082143.0000799e@gmail.com>
	<68ee4eaf-6c13-15c5-e16c-6452946266ab@example.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net EjjmGHEQH9Xa/iPlTWLjKgyPqx4/sY/sJYzbrKLNO5z4LFcRRX
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2riG9i9A3kDbxrXdlvfpzUZ2S+8= sha256:OQL2bPXk67KNuVNfi3nM+n0II1SnPjuqDDc+TFHf++s=
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Bytes: 3432

On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 01:33:42 +0100, D wrote:

> Hallucinations will probably have to be "fixed" by either hiring
> africans to double check answers, sorry "fact check", and then store
> those so that similar queries are redirected to those canned answers.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/12/journal-editors-resign-to-protest-
ai-use-high-fees-and-more/

"In-house production has been reduced or outsourced, and in 2023 Elsevier 
began using AI during production without informing the board, resulting in 
many style and formatting errors, as well as reversing versions of papers 
that had already been accepted and formatted by the editors. “This was 
highly embarrassing for the journal and resolution took six months and was 
achieved only through the persistent efforts of the editors," the editors 
wrote. "AI processing continues to be used and regularly reformats 
submitted manuscripts to change meaning and formatting and require 
extensive author and editor oversight during proof stage.”

"There is certainly cause for concern when it comes to using AI in the 
pursuit of science. For instance, earlier this year, we witnessed the 
viral sensation of several egregiously bad AI-generated figures published 
in a peer-reviewed article in Frontiers, a reputable scientific journal. 
Scientists on social media expressed equal parts shock and ridicule at the 
images, one of which featured a rat with grotesquely large and bizarre 
genitals. The paper has since been retracted, but the incident reinforces 
a growing concern that AI will make published scientific research less 
trustworthy, even as it increases productivity."


Somehow a rat with big balls really upset them.