Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Intel, AMD engineers rush to save Linux 6.13 after dodgy
 Microsoft code change
Date: 15 Jan 2025 06:13:18 GMT
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <lup1vuF9kqgU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <luofsuF6gdtU3@mid.individual.net>
	<luoidlF6geaU4@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net GDddqxPj5Qfu0n0oHQqRbg7FhvRFJKKWKtvq4aixDx6TmWjJAE
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZQLjnUpvj7/9OYIQ2rGvs1nECUM= sha256:wGokNJEJLy0M62AySlPk0w9TM2kLhn5t0uzKH5B1GJE=
User-Agent: Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
Bytes: 1663

On 15 Jan 2025 01:47:33 GMT, vallor wrote:

> On 15 Jan 2025 01:04:32 GMT, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote in
> <luofsuF6gdtU3@mid.individual.net>:
> 
>> https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/14/microsoft_linux_change_pulled/
>> 
>> We're only here to help...  The good news is when vallor, with his
>> thing about kernels, builds 6.13 it won't blow up.
> 
> And I booted the latest rc kernel just yesterday.  I guess I'm running
> the dodgy Microsoft code(!).
> 
> Pardon me, while I go boot the release Linux, 6.12.9.  (Incidentally,
> I've noticed Fedora stays one release behind the current release -- is
> that on purpose?)

I just got 6.12.9 with the dnf update about an hour ago. I don't know if 
there is a method in their madness. I took the Ubuntu box up to 24.04 last 
week and it's still 6.8.0. It works.