| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<lvd4bvFed7nU6@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Synology Diskstation architecture (was: Re: News : ARM Trying to Buy AmperComputing) Date: 22 Jan 2025 20:56:31 GMT Lines: 21 Message-ID: <lvd4bvFed7nU6@mid.individual.net> References: <_hycnQxlN5kAphr6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <36bf96a5-527c-1d8b-a93b-6788cdd589a2@example.net> <1PKcna3Yf6vdFhX6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com> <b0808927-ab4c-5c09-69db-608552e94989@example.net> <vmapu2$3foi7$2@dont-email.me> <7b19252d-bfe8-9d48-0cd2-eb33e4a64179@example.net> <67897bb3@news.ausics.net> <lutkoeF1tatU1@mid.individual.net> <6d5c7f67-7c7b-66aa-d9d3-54f71f77ae43@example.net> <luvpr9Fc5laU3@mid.individual.net> <198f4f8c-a0d0-7caf-b67e-1f61fee9de41@example.net> <UcicndjNUaEg0hH6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <35e42921-5781-8728-236f-afad1d3b56b1@example.net> <vSydnd3xKfdNFhD6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com> <7258fd01-44f7-850d-3f69-54b93489f64d@example.net> <vml7e7$31s95$1@dont-email.me> <69ce04cf-80a7-7170-675f-4165ffedc92b@example.net> <RtudnVi93qkPcBP6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com> <lv8g84Fm488U4@mid.individual.net> <naWcnZgz34APvxL6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@earthlink.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net bl1OsGjHUbriCjGqcQyFZQSrSH2QP/O9oNFsfWm5v62BFOXHy6 Cancel-Lock: sha1:8xgOtVfs5RkVOmto/TNQuRBz4Tw= sha256:ayYgGp6pvxIgErb0UutPnZg1cQf0qmsmkd043aguOBk= X-Face: +McU)#<-H?9lTb(Th!zR`EpVrp<0)1p5CmPu.kOscy8LRp_\u`:tW;dxPo./(fCl CaKku`)]}.V/"6rISCIDP` User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Hmm2; c45f6052; Linux-6.13.0) Bytes: 2552 On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 23:29:02 -0500, "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote in <naWcnZgz34APvxL6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@earthlink.com>: > Last one I bought was basically a Celeron. Worked fine for a > medium-sized office. > > The ARM-v7 series are 32-bitters, probably a rough equiv of yer basic > Celeron in performance. > > In short you don't need an i9 for an NAS. The I/O waits suck up > everything. Much of anything above yer Celeron or A7 is a waste of > CPU. I agree for now, but that's going to change once people attach faster and faster lans to NAS' -- and they start working with drives faster than SATA III. -- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti OS: Linux 6.13.0 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G "Catalan: Local area network for Cats."