| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<m0-dnebK_6k1nar6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:04:56 +0000 Subject: Re: The joy of Linux Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc References: <pan$96411$d204da43$cc34bb91$1fe98651@linux.rocks> <lpakk8FcaadU1@mid.individual.net> <z76cnW_bz8R9xq36nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com> <lpb9e8Ff81cU1@mid.individual.net> <b42cnauiXOPqzqz6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@earthlink.com> <lpdaffFolv6U1@mid.individual.net> <jomcnblCU7j0bq_6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vgv46v$1gc50$14@dont-email.me> <OkOdnT6GGL7D9an6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com> <vh1plv$244df$5@dont-email.me> <JxqdnWkmMuJnDqj6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vh50o8$2repr$1@dont-email.me> From: "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> Organization: wokiesux Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 03:04:35 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <vh50o8$2repr$1@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <m0-dnebK_6k1nar6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com> Lines: 57 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.101.150.97 X-Trace: sv3-jRjU928lpt3xMApyFaluuBcwdIEttBgr2+R3U0J3e/QSZOJW9yyc38zDLGbuFWYn5SODYjmafjy00ac!3pjXX0OmYO5NRhsfI7+vny3pzkLkQfRAxMM86ZPr1JeqH5t0antHk1f3w8nlstFWvhFEf/WUw9Qy!TsnlP5JQYrhPhstedeOz X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 3994 On 11/14/24 9:16 AM, Rich wrote: > 186282@ud0s4.net <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote: >> On 11/13/24 3:57 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 13/11/2024 08:50, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>> Most 60s cars used >>>> DRUM brakes, you got maybe two or three good >>>> apps before they'd fade. >>> >>> The thing about drum brakes is that they have slight but significant >>> innate brake assistance - the leading shoe tends to wedge itself on. >> >> Yep - likely By Design. >> >> BUT, the instant things get red hot - NO more brakes. >> Modern discs/pads ARE superior. > > Disks are superior, but don't think you can't make them fade with > over-application. They too will fade if the rotors get hot enough. > The reason why they don't fade as easily is the design provides more > cooling, so it takes more braking application to achieve the same > 'fade' level. VERY aware of that. They DO cool quicker however. BIG advantage. >>> I don't want to go back to unassisted brakes and no power steering >>> either. >> >> "Unassisted" CAN be OK ... but it takes a little >> practice. >> >> Had an early-60s car that DID have power steering, >> but I was too broke to replace the pump. THAT built >> up the arm muscles ! 384 replaced with a 426 ... >> massive power, needed a booster fuel pump ! > > A proper 'manual steer' car is easier to drive than a power steering > car with the power steering disabled. The gearing in the steering unit > is set differently for power assist units vs. true manual steer units, > and power assist, without the power assist, is much harder to steer. Oh, VERY aware of THAT ... the fucker was insanely difficult - took major effort. BUT, I could barely afford gas money back then ... > It is the same with power assist brakes. The hydralic multiplication > factor is different between power assist master cylinders and true > manual cylinders. The power assist brakes, without the power assist, > will require much more force on the pedal than a 'manual brake' system > requires to produce the same stopping power. I'd rather have un-powered steering than faulty power brakes. The systems were NOT set up to cope with unpowered brakes fer-sure. You'd have to weigh 400 pounds to get a good stop.