Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Fun with ChatGPT: Relativity is a lucky pseudoscience that fails
 at atomiic level.
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 07:59:34 +0100
Lines: 93
Message-ID: <m00mahFl6r3U2@mid.individual.net>
References: <0d509b1635259917c7b4407251adcf31@www.novabbs.com>
 <3a42db544af628ec3969d6b80f1122b7@www.novabbs.com>
 <e613885e553df4e05738929b0c9eb9a9@www.novabbs.com>
 <99a0b6f82daafa4c7f7db42b177c6415@www.novabbs.com>
 <lvu43oF8kd9U1@mid.individual.net>
 <bfecab41294ec2664e5b98a423857d6d@www.novabbs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net y17/8s9ZNlNqxDrT40u4pQeb4yUDn/xZY85Zvo/WV5PYKqAJFr
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zlXtjFw3u9l/7hK2NGThe5qu10A= sha256:3GVar0Kcxnhm1ONN7iPMDz/70A3UEnTQgJVLSdi7Ofo=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE, en-US
In-Reply-To: <bfecab41294ec2664e5b98a423857d6d@www.novabbs.com>
Bytes: 4242

Am Mittwoch000029, 29.01.2025 um 17:06 schrieb Bertietaylor:

>>>
>>> Regarding GR, it started to mumble shit about quantum spacetime and
>>> Planck's lengths and times, to later accept that IT'S BELIEVED that GR
>>> has to have a role in atom's behavior, but immediately it added that
>>> such area is under heavy study by several researches, and that such
>>> influence of GR on atom's behavior IS FAR FROM BEING KNOWN BY NOW.
>>>
>>> Also, added that efforts to incorporate quantum spacetime in atomic
>>> theory have been made in the last decades without results (string
>>> theory, quantum loop gravity, etc.). Additionally, added that a
>>> completely new theory is needed, but there are no indications that
>>> current proposals are going to succeed.
>>
>>
>> Well, how about my own idea?
>>
>> It isn't that new anymore, but aims to fill that gap and base particles
>> on spacetime of GR.
> 
> Just forget the depravity of all relativity.
>>
>> The concept is therefore called 'stractured spacetime', where 'timelike
>> stable patterns' are, what we call 'matter'.
> 
> Matter is charge - electrons orbiting protons or getting stuck to
> protons.


This is 'materialism' (also known as 'particle concept').

I wanted to prove, that matter is actually not materialistic, but is 
build from imaterial 'structures'.

As 'proof of concept' I used 'Growing Earth'.

This goes like this:

if the Earth would grow from within, we can be certain, that the 
particle concept must be wrong, because there can't be enough particles 
inside of this planet to make it grow from within.

But if matter is actually 'relative', the Earth could grow, we could use 
'spacetime of GR' as replacement for 'aether' and all are happy.


>>
>> See my 'book' about this idea:
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/ 
>> d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> Relativistic effects are in this concept not related to velocity but to
>> acceleration.
> 
> Relativistic effects occur from Earth's movement in space.


Well, no!

'Space' has a different role in my concept.

It is is actually based on complex numbers (complex valued four vectors) 
and an imaginary axis of time, which multiplied by i gives the three 
real valued axes of space.

So: the term 'space' is depending on the axis of time, because  a 
multiplication by i means (kind of) 90° rotation.

Now this has only a relevance, if you would rotate the axis of time a 
bit, because in this case a new space would pop out of nowhere, which is 
filled with matter never seen before.


>> IOW: you could create matter out of nothing, by acceleration of
>> spacetime.
> 
> Protons and electrons come from aether and vanish into aether. The most
> striking demonstration is growth from life internal forces; cell
> splitting into two.
>>
>> This should be observable in some cases as 'Growing Earth' or 'magic
>> dust'.
> 
> See any cell split. how matter appears.
> We come from aether. We return to aether.

Kind of...



TH