Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Einstein divided by zero
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 10:04:46 +0100
Lines: 100
Message-ID: <m03i16F4mobU4@mid.individual.net>
References: <0d509b1635259917c7b4407251adcf31@www.novabbs.com>
 <3a42db544af628ec3969d6b80f1122b7@www.novabbs.com>
 <e613885e553df4e05738929b0c9eb9a9@www.novabbs.com>
 <99a0b6f82daafa4c7f7db42b177c6415@www.novabbs.com>
 <lvu43oF8kd9U1@mid.individual.net>
 <bfecab41294ec2664e5b98a423857d6d@www.novabbs.com>
 <m00mahFl6r3U2@mid.individual.net>
 <3795f1661821b0b6cb79fd4fbbc09035@www.novabbs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net BJyqa1J6yU4y/gm36J8D5gx55m+/cBoU5b4TZdB4f538kHmya6
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OBoEC08QvY+fzEkUuqGUwD8zhUg= sha256:o8Ve+eEra0WGh8vRlWt3PIzS4ESI/eGYC5l5AdaOP/Q=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE, en-US
In-Reply-To: <3795f1661821b0b6cb79fd4fbbc09035@www.novabbs.com>
Bytes: 4738

Am Donnerstag000030, 30.01.2025 um 08:39 schrieb Bertietaylor:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 6:59:34 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
>> Am Mittwoch000029, 29.01.2025 um 17:06 schrieb Bertietaylor:
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regarding GR, it started to mumble shit about quantum spacetime and
>>>>> Planck's lengths and times, to later accept that IT'S BELIEVED that GR
>>>>> has to have a role in atom's behavior, but immediately it added that
>>>>> such area is under heavy study by several researches, and that such
>>>>> influence of GR on atom's behavior IS FAR FROM BEING KNOWN BY NOW.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, added that efforts to incorporate quantum spacetime in atomic
>>>>> theory have been made in the last decades without results (string
>>>>> theory, quantum loop gravity, etc.). Additionally, added that a
>>>>> completely new theory is needed, but there are no indications that
>>>>> current proposals are going to succeed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, how about my own idea?
>>>>
>>>> It isn't that new anymore, but aims to fill that gap and base particles
>>>> on spacetime of GR.
>>>
>>> Just forget the depravity of all relativity.
>>>>
>>>> The concept is therefore called 'stractured spacetime', where 'timelike
>>>> stable patterns' are, what we call 'matter'.
>>>
>>> Matter is charge - electrons orbiting protons or getting stuck to
>>> protons.
>>
>>
>> This is 'materialism' (also known as 'particle concept').
> 
> Not necessarily. Charges are force generating entities composed from
> aether. We are all composed of charges moving through infinitely fine
> aether in an infinite universe. Dreamy but explains all.
>>
>> I wanted to prove, that matter is actually not materialistic, but is
>> build from imaterial 'structures'.
> 
> Charge is built from aether, a material solid.
>>
>> As 'proof of concept' I used 'Growing Earth'.
>>
>> This goes like this:
>>
>> if the Earth would grow from within, we can be certain, that the
>> particle concept must be wrong, because there can't be enough particles
>> inside of this planet to make it grow from within.
> 
> Well a charge can be approximated as a particle for kinetic effects.
>>
>> But if matter is actually 'relative', the Earth could grow, we could use
>> 'spacetime of GR' as replacement for 'aether' and all are happy.
> 
> Just throw out all the wrong, stupid, evil, vile, ridiculous, shameless
> and unscientific SR and GR shit.

this simply not true.

I assume, that GR is correct, but do not really deal with GR.

E.g. I regard the validity of the existence of spacetime of GR as an axiom.

But I made no attempts to prove this and also made not attempts to find 
out, what spacetime actually is.

About Einstein's 'On the electrydynamics of moving bodies' I have 
written many longish articles and explained, that it is full of errors.

E.g. I found a new and very obvious an dcritical error here:

See page six, rougly in the middle:

There we find an equation, which says this:

∂τ/∂y= 0

Now, 'tau' is the time of the moving system k.

This system k moves along the x-axis of system K with velocity v, while 
x- and xsi-axis coincide and etha- and y axis remain parallel.

In other words v_y is permanently zero, or: ∂y=0.

So we have a 'divide by zero' case.

∂τ/∂y could approach a value, however, but if v_y goes to zero, the 
quotient ∂τ/∂y would go to infinity and NOT to zero (as the equation says).

Iow: this equation (∂τ/∂y= 0) is wrong!

TH


....