Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: vallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again
Date: 12 Feb 2025 04:33:42 GMT
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <m12ml6F2hakU4@mid.individual.net>
References: <vo75q5$3vki0$1@dont-email.me> <zCJpP.39$EyH6.1@fx45.iad>
	<vo7ttl$3nof$1@dont-email.me> <qhLpP.67094$za5e.59176@fx09.iad>
	<vo830p$4ntj$1@dont-email.me> <f_1qP.80552$YsRf.33634@fx18.iad>
	<vocbbn$1444h$1@dont-email.me> <1WoqP.4088$NgFa.1524@fx46.iad>
	<voeqct$1lgc9$1@dont-email.me> <6CIqP.4095$NgFa.688@fx46.iad>
	<vogq82$20qbu$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net LGA6UUr3J4WB37Vpo7g2EwYCGE10t8PY+0fD9DxNkPqEN2KtYD
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zxvLr7AqLFrnFI22g81dRWsuP3E= sha256:NHCFwdEupGElgoKjHJ8+Pvmq+g5ViTQ0tw+j+rphzTc=
X-Face: +McU)#<-H?9lTb(Th!zR`EpVrp<0)1p5CmPu.kOscy8LRp_\u`:tW;dxPo./(fCl
 CaKku`)]}.V/"6rISCIDP`
User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Hmm3; dea36dc9; Linux-6.14.0-rc2)
Bytes: 2625

On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:33:06 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <vogq82$20qbu$1@dont-email.me>:

> On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 08:51:59 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:
> 
>> I'm not sure why they bothered making Flatpaks and Snaps when AppImages
>> work pretty much everywhere.
> 
> I don’t understand the point of any of them. They seem like attempts to 
> retrofit something that looks like MSI (only slightly better designed) 
> onto the Linux ecosystem. Why? Clearly it is to woo the proprietary 
> software developers -- the ones who don’t want to release their source 
> code to let the distro maintainers worry about packaging.
> 
> The downside is that each SnapImage/FlatApp/whatever has to carry around 
> all its dependencies with it, instead of being able to share dependencies 
> through the package system. The idea that developers, particularly 
> proprietary developers, can do a better job of keeping these dependencies 
> up to date than the distro maintainers (whose job it is to do just that), 
> just seems laughable.

Flatpak and such is okay, but snaps are evil.

There is no way to host your own "snap repository".  It's all controlled
by Canonical.  Rubs me the wrong way.  Same with the Mint maintainers:
by default, snaps are disabled on Linux Mint.

-- 
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
   OS: Linux 6.14.0-rc2 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G
   "Psychoceramics: The study of crackpots."