Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again
Date: 12 Feb 2025 19:16:21 GMT
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <m14ac5Fee9pU4@mid.individual.net>
References: <vo75q5$3vki0$1@dont-email.me> <zCJpP.39$EyH6.1@fx45.iad>
	<vo7ttl$3nof$1@dont-email.me> <qhLpP.67094$za5e.59176@fx09.iad>
	<vo830p$4ntj$1@dont-email.me> <f_1qP.80552$YsRf.33634@fx18.iad>
	<vocbbn$1444h$1@dont-email.me> <1WoqP.4088$NgFa.1524@fx46.iad>
	<voeqct$1lgc9$1@dont-email.me> <6CIqP.4095$NgFa.688@fx46.iad>
	<voheq0$27eqp$1@dont-email.me> <ZT1rP.468602$YsRf.357723@fx18.iad>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net cBL5wTRzredNFNrFd+QQdgKL0bZZ0ibP7gP9RFkRtT8MTuqBum
Cancel-Lock: sha1:h67UY4cuChB40RDDk/6MSELeEMU= sha256:HxeCGmeGsOj+YIUXZziMlMvj67MXDi2DZFYWMNN+s58=
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
Bytes: 1494

On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:04:40 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:

> Considering AppImage exists since 2004, it's a wonder that Red Hat and
> Canonical felt the need to create their own. It might have been easier
> to just improve it and make sure that it integrates properly with the
> system.

NIH? I don't know how valid/important the sandboxing argument is. I'm the 
sole user of any of my machines so it's a PITA if anything.