Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: occam <occam@nowhere.nix>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,alt.usage.english
Subject: Re: 25 Classic Books That Have Been Banned
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 11:47:57 +0100
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <m1j6qtFq4hmU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <03gqqj562r4vi0kpi2vl8flsi59jsbot56@4ax.com>
 <m1is6aFojfiU1@mid.individual.net> <vp1ie2$1kmm2$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net nJqhrT3xT7fihLzZ7w2sNAsen4bMe0VCCLKiYzir3QecGLIMDQ
Cancel-Lock: sha1:j5K0MvyR5ldNaN4K2ge615fYg+8= sha256:TTRk2ySVeZKH+mqYt2SVrXhc18pVqBRk1DdxCHkQ6sE=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <vp1ie2$1kmm2$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 1251

On 18/02/2025 10:04, Bertel Lund Hansen wrote:
> occam wrote:
> 
>> When I eventually tracked it down, I could not figure out which
>> passage(s) were the offending ones that got up the beard of Ayatollah
>> Khomeini. Ironic, given that the fatwah was issued by a follower of an
>> illiterate Prophet.
> 
> Maybe they just reacted to the title?
> 

<eejit!>