Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: Re: S paceTime
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 07:55:23 +0100
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <m1ldhoF5m60U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <67A0465F.1394@ix.netcom.com> <67A072A1.4890@ix.netcom.com>
 <1820ae376b46d694$13020$1427260$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <67A10C50.3153@ix.netcom.com>
 <1820c709d718ea16$13041$1427260$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <67A11070.5121@ix.netcom.com>
 <1820ca3af637642c$10679$1417112$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <67A12A10.2A78@ix.netcom.com>
 <1820d0d57014da41$10681$1417112$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <67A13FC6.25E2@ix.netcom.com>
 <1820d33f2e981c00$15766$1407297$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <67A17706.484A@ix.netcom.com> <67A1AAC0.624F@ix.netcom.com>
 <67A9AB1B.71B8@ix.netcom.com> <67AB1CF3.F7F@ix.netcom.com>
 <67AB8F77.3FF9@ix.netcom.com> <67AB97E4.629F@ix.netcom.com>
 <67AB9DF2.1A88@ix.netcom.com> <67ABA607.5170@ix.netcom.com>
 <67AED1F5.1CEC@ix.netcom.com> <67B04BEF.2A1D@ix.netcom.com>
 <voqlc8$95om$2@solani.org> <67B17B21.3ABB@ix.netcom.com>
 <67B28FA4.32D4@ix.netcom.com> <voub72$br6o$1@solani.org>
 <voubgp$br6o$2@solani.org> <voud1g$br6o$3@solani.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net gkRCuN5N4J3uFfrIhEhX0Aj8B4yJCFJ+FNKlL8hknfLmEmx1GW
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UDifURm03u9pfUTKuGMd+UlN8ko= sha256:EpILQcrWfYSItTGe2PVh6CFgGQUoPpCqGdN7xKE0HEQ=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE, en-US
In-Reply-To: <voud1g$br6o$3@solani.org>
Bytes: 3908

Am Montag000017, 17.02.2025 um 05:13 schrieb Physfitfreak:
> On 2/16/25 9:47 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>> On 2/16/25 9:42 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>> My guess is that the information of its disappearance will travel 
>>> towards Earth at, or below, the light's speed (i.e. max speed for any 
>>> physical quantity) and when it reaches Earth, the path of Earth 
>>> motion becomes almost linear from that moment on.
>>
>>
>> Actually it can crush the Earth into pieces because parts of the Earth 
>> closer to the absent Sun's position will begin moving linearly while 
>> the rest of the Earth still continues on the usual orbit. So a 
>> crushing of Earth into itself will take place for a couple of seconds 
>> or so.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> This could actually be one of the sources of earthquakes on Earth. When 
> Sun quickly gives off huge masses in some of its storms, the resulting 
> change in gravity will hit the closer parts of the Earth first before 
> traveling through its diameter. So parts of the earth crashes against 
> itself as the tiny change of the orbit passes through the entire mass of 
> Earth.

My guess about earthquakes was long ago:

Earthquakes come actually from the Sun and are related to conductivity 
of the ground in faults, where the Birkeland currents (which are powered 
by magnetic connection of Sun and Earth) induce currents into the ground.

The currents in that fault lines provide tension to the surrounding 
material, which is less conducting and which is therefore subject to 
high electric tension.

This causes an 'inverted piezo effect', which makes the soil shake.

We could see this effect in several instances, where Solar eclipses 
played a role in earthquakes or where 'electric' effects occurred in the 
sky.

Also water near mountains seemingly has an influence, because water 
conducts, too.

Earthquakes have also not the typical scratching sound, but have a 
relatively long phase, where the Earth shakes with almost the same 
amplitude and frequency.

Therefor my assumption was, that earthquakes are in fact 'electric' and 
their power stems from the sun.

TH