Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<m2clmbFl430U10@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com> Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN Date: 28 Feb 2025 02:34:52 GMT Lines: 16 Message-ID: <m2clmbFl430U10@mid.individual.net> References: <5mqdnZuGq4lgwm_7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <971448126.749088380.092448.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <vd5195$edas$1@dont-email.me> <59CJO.19674$MoU3.15170@fx36.iad> <vd6vto$r0so$1@dont-email.me> <iJEJO.198176$kxD8.81657@fx11.iad> <3hOdnWpQ649QMGr7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vd8doi$15q07$1@dont-email.me> <vd8eg7$15v1j$2@dont-email.me> <cxicnVzg_cn_eGX7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vdapbn$1kp35$5@dont-email.me> <lltpunF4fseU2@mid.individual.net> <1smdnSjX3YoxgWf7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com> <llv30aFa6uvU3@mid.individual.net> <vde4b8$268qv$22@dont-email.me> <1396870532.749421730.052473.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <wrapper-20241001111737@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <vpl5uk$hhk$3@reader1.panix.com> <c4acndn4jJXKwCP6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <1214951717.762291306.657281.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <m2a04pF90mqU2@mid.individual.net> <vppj5n$33b82$4@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net pp4qranf8LAPe8/bGV5AOQKhZqDR5Z68e1aRlWYqXYLFr96zqk Cancel-Lock: sha1:WhZNtJAQylME7Ev4ITc4WurgxO0= sha256:r3ku4cqwwIEFTzXzEcTBNq67jCJQgJ8aefLT1kOUzu0= User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Bytes: 2363 On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 11:43:51 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > When all you had was Macro assembler, writing a good library of Macros > gave you almost a high level language, except it wasn't portable. > > C *was* portable, mostly. > > And it was faster to write than Macros assembler. It was really a no > brainer. Sadly, macros made their way into C. The basic idea was fine but we had one programmer who laid awake nights thinking up new perverted things to do with macros. I forget if it was Kernighan or Ritchie who later said if they had only known what people would do with them... C++ doubled down with inline functions.