Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<m2clmbFl430U10@mid.individual.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN
Date: 28 Feb 2025 02:34:52 GMT
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <m2clmbFl430U10@mid.individual.net>
References: <5mqdnZuGq4lgwm_7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<971448126.749088380.092448.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
	<vd5195$edas$1@dont-email.me> <59CJO.19674$MoU3.15170@fx36.iad>
	<vd6vto$r0so$1@dont-email.me> <iJEJO.198176$kxD8.81657@fx11.iad>
	<3hOdnWpQ649QMGr7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vd8doi$15q07$1@dont-email.me> <vd8eg7$15v1j$2@dont-email.me>
	<cxicnVzg_cn_eGX7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vdapbn$1kp35$5@dont-email.me> <lltpunF4fseU2@mid.individual.net>
	<1smdnSjX3YoxgWf7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<llv30aFa6uvU3@mid.individual.net> <vde4b8$268qv$22@dont-email.me>
	<1396870532.749421730.052473.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
	<wrapper-20241001111737@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
	<vpl5uk$hhk$3@reader1.panix.com>
	<c4acndn4jJXKwCP6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<1214951717.762291306.657281.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
	<m2a04pF90mqU2@mid.individual.net> <vppj5n$33b82$4@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net pp4qranf8LAPe8/bGV5AOQKhZqDR5Z68e1aRlWYqXYLFr96zqk
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WhZNtJAQylME7Ev4ITc4WurgxO0= sha256:r3ku4cqwwIEFTzXzEcTBNq67jCJQgJ8aefLT1kOUzu0=
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
Bytes: 2363

On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 11:43:51 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> When all you had was Macro assembler, writing a good library of Macros
> gave you almost a high level language, except it wasn't portable.
> 
> C *was* portable, mostly.
> 
> And it was faster to write than Macros assembler. It was really a no
> brainer.

Sadly, macros made their way into C. The basic idea was fine but we had 
one programmer who laid awake nights thinking up new perverted things to 
do with macros. I forget if it was Kernighan or Ritchie who later said if 
they had only known what people would do with them...

C++ doubled down with inline functions.