| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<m2ttf0F98hpU2@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Two 9s reliability? Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 15:31:37 +0000 Lines: 9 Message-ID: <m2ttf0F98hpU2@mid.individual.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net /2JfBVDDqYwyz1/pJXRTDALST3VllokkByXwHVfnQ2xB1uNC9Q Cancel-Lock: sha1:fIfHyHayzx9Vt5sxtGuMv3TrYaA= sha256:ejrmUlIXsNDswVIpnJnbDASl3NQ828tHrJOfRRx6Rsc= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 1015 It seems that collectively** the UK banks have had more than 33 days of downtime within two years, I make that under "two 9s" rather than "five 9s" <https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cjd3yzx3xgvo> [**] yeah, sure it's not correct to just add up downtime across banks, but several of them have had downtime simultaneously ...