| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<m4j08fF29ojU1@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Helmet efficacy test Date: 26 Mar 2025 18:44:31 GMT Lines: 19 Message-ID: <m4j08fF29ojU1@mid.individual.net> References: <vrru3v$152e3$3@dont-email.me> <vrrvqs$1816i$1@dont-email.me> <vrs3qh$19skh$3@dont-email.me> <vrs44b$1bva2$1@dont-email.me> <vrshuc$1o91s$1@dont-email.me> <6MnEP.483428$f81.458565@fx48.iad> <vruekv$3fet8$6@dont-email.me> <vruiud$3k0mh$1@dont-email.me> <omk5ujdokthdiisv5phuclarec9hhm9utp@4ax.com> <vrvpdc$j8eo$11@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net nUbjGAPmEcR+K3NzO23KUgRCtwUpXEq4mERb8OFB0DaGU6aYi/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:ftMo5Ns6NOQVCnTuYU9sqwzKpfg= sha1:soS/bpHQ6JPkoAXsAQzPzpxYiGg= sha256:FdnMgmCjpqCYT/BfowORXNbwCi4ZAM8KpZ117VbznNI= User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad) Bytes: 1954 Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > On 3/25/2025 12:07 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote: >> >> Two wheel recumbents can be trickier than standard diamond frames >> because the center of grvity is lower. You can feel the difference >> between sitting upright and being on the drops with a regular bike. > Let me take a rare opportunity to agree with Catrike Rider. The lower > polar moment of inertia about the ground means recumbents are trickier > to balance. On the other hand, antique Ordinaries or Penny Farthings are > amazingly easy to balance even at near zero speed. > And had a very short life span the Penny Farthings, as the safety bike replaced them relatively quickly, saw a talk about them by a minor TV celebrity (Jeremy Vine) at a church fair I went to last weekend, and they are being made and ridden again! Roger Merriman