Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<m4j08fF29ojU1@mid.individual.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: Helmet efficacy test
Date: 26 Mar 2025 18:44:31 GMT
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <m4j08fF29ojU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <vrru3v$152e3$3@dont-email.me>
 <vrrvqs$1816i$1@dont-email.me>
 <vrs3qh$19skh$3@dont-email.me>
 <vrs44b$1bva2$1@dont-email.me>
 <vrshuc$1o91s$1@dont-email.me>
 <6MnEP.483428$f81.458565@fx48.iad>
 <vruekv$3fet8$6@dont-email.me>
 <vruiud$3k0mh$1@dont-email.me>
 <omk5ujdokthdiisv5phuclarec9hhm9utp@4ax.com>
 <vrvpdc$j8eo$11@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net nUbjGAPmEcR+K3NzO23KUgRCtwUpXEq4mERb8OFB0DaGU6aYi/
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ftMo5Ns6NOQVCnTuYU9sqwzKpfg= sha1:soS/bpHQ6JPkoAXsAQzPzpxYiGg= sha256:FdnMgmCjpqCYT/BfowORXNbwCi4ZAM8KpZ117VbznNI=
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Bytes: 1954

Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On 3/25/2025 12:07 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
>> 
>> Two wheel recumbents can be trickier than standard diamond frames
>> because the center of grvity is lower. You can feel the difference
>> between sitting upright and being on the drops with a regular bike.
> Let me take a rare opportunity to agree with Catrike Rider. The lower 
> polar moment of inertia about the ground means recumbents are trickier 
> to balance. On the other hand, antique Ordinaries or Penny Farthings are 
> amazingly easy to balance even at near zero speed.
> 

And had a very short life span the Penny Farthings, as the safety bike
replaced them relatively quickly, saw a talk about them by a minor TV
celebrity (Jeremy Vine) at a church fair I went to last weekend, and they
are being made and ridden again!

Roger Merriman