Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<m5ap7fFr19rU3@mid.individual.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Past Blast - "Wonder Woman 1984" - Corp Guy Using PET
Date: 4 Apr 2025 19:11:44 GMT
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <m5ap7fFr19rU3@mid.individual.net>
References: <3LScnf6o-ddHmXD6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<m55g9gF1fe1U1@mid.individual.net>
	<PrWcnfSsir_Q_3P6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<m5834aFe093U2@mid.individual.net>
	<vLqdnVb4yaZObXP6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<m58omiFguqjU3@mid.individual.net> <20250404075333.000000fc@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net xI/I/P+sBuX/7jcF9EXC1wgBBzhiwxDXi8FwuRu6JLe9qLwtbV
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/w+FxeftDLYlJAbnSGu8Lke/O0w= sha256:NbCE6bJvHnH+y+PPLUAf+8HVoQtAV3xANe7r82qTUxQ=
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
Bytes: 1956

On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 07:53:33 -0700, John Ames wrote:

> On 4 Apr 2025 00:50:26 GMT rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> 
>> The version I bought was for CP/M. TBH I wasn't all that interested in
>> Pascal but I wanted to see what you could possibly get for $49.95.
> 
> That was the key: fast, usable, and *way* cheaper than anything else on
> the market. (Microsoft C - really just a re-branded Lattice C - cost
> *ten times as much,* the same year TP rolled out.) Whether Pascal was
> your favorite programming language or not, that made a *big* difference
> to scrappy independent developers and prospective enterpreneurs.

Microsoft C 3.0 was a polished product for its day with printed manuals 
and everything. GE paid for it so I don't know what it cost. Before they 
got into Windows I thought of MS more as a tool provider, with MSDOS as an 
afterthought. It was third party TSRs and, iirc, Quaterdeck's memory 
manager that made DOS on an AT usable.