| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<m5mb0gFnu6sU1@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: KA7500 vs TL494 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 21:22:37 -0700 Lines: 51 Message-ID: <m5mb0gFnu6sU1@mid.individual.net> References: <h9b5uj1g7bl5ie2l321qoduc2a7tu7d8it@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net Km7Ouukz1vbexjpbRMsuOw7nQqJXVm89sBJ+3J2TCAiJJ7UCeu Cancel-Lock: sha1:GOA2TeReGRhHbTnMnL2hwrjkQr8= sha256:Nz00sis9MoVDNFw4zbFKTPdU3RmP2DC2JOBWCL5Gq5Q= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1 In-Reply-To: <h9b5uj1g7bl5ie2l321qoduc2a7tu7d8it@4ax.com> Content-Language: en-US On 3/25/25 6:25 AM, legg wrote: > Chinese commodity power supplies have tended to use recognizable > configurations from times gone by. In doing so, it's easy to > miss some of the 'small stuff' that actually produced a reliable > product, in the day. > > Even more so, when pricing reaches the 'replace vs repair' threshold > - why even bother with burn-in, in that case? If no burn-in or field > return failure analysis is ever consudered, the small errors persist, > particularly if vendors play wack-a-mole with the same hardware > offered under different brand names and paperwork. > Burn-in? Doesn't that happen at the customer? :-) > Case in point is a 5V 40A unit advertised 'for use in LED sign', > commonly used in Onbon product. In the application where a repair > or replace decision was made, actual consumption was in the 35W > range, though a test sequence could draw much higher power. > replacement with an identically rated unit was Cdn$22.00. > > The replacement was physically and schematically identical, but > relaid as a mirror image for component placement. Different > brand name. > > Anyways - a basic self-oscillating bipolar transistor half bridge > with forced beta, synchronized/steered and pwm'd by opening and > shorting the resistor-limited, center-tapped 'drive' winding. > Open collector drive out of a KA7500. > > What's a KA7500 ? Turns out to be pin compatible to TL494, but > mfrd by Samsung/Fairchild/ONS. > > http://ve3ute.ca/query/TL494_vs_KA7500.pdf > > Oodles of data and apps for the 494, not so much for the 7500. > If anyone's got app info published for the KA7900, in any > language, I'd be interested to see it. > You mean a datasheet? It's here: https://www.mouser.com/datasheet/2/149/KA7500C-89501.pdf?srsltid=AfmBOoqgRNYOTol-O6pVSUwQ0v07-Tqdgmcnph3f_Uq5xj18Tvq5uAYY [...] -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/