Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 06:27:22 +0200
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <m5rjvvFj157U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <67EF682D.135A@ix.netcom.com> <86a58p8lgf.fsf@example.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net OebO71VhlfWWcGiH3Q621wL2ZvvdcSZWb0o6FBJNc8obiu27/K
Cancel-Lock: sha1:X5nOU1DPfFJ1y/719dV33Idbfoc= sha256:EfU7ncDlPYBrf+AonqBFwQ2trr64gaHlhIGGVeHCEH0=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <86a58p8lgf.fsf@example.com>
Bytes: 1505

Am Mittwoch000009, 09.04.2025 um 16:21 schrieb Richmond:
> What does 'exist' mean? Why suppose that it was ever possible for
> nothing to exist?


This is a very good riddle!

Well, actually I assumed, that 'big-bang' was actually the 'white side' 
of a 'black hole'.

So, that 'big-bang singularity ' was something, that is called 'white hole'.

This is possible, because I would regard black holes as vortices, which 
behave timelike and like the center of what is called 'light cone'.

This is black from 'the other side', because light is black, if seen 
from behind.

Seen from the other side, light is white and its origin therefore a 
'white hole'.


TH