Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Robin Miller <robin.miller@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Deportation of Khalil
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2025 17:00:05 -0400
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <m62munFn8stU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <vteolb$1evbb$1@dont-email.me> <vtgnnv$knp$1@solani.org>
 <vtgpap$39gqo$1@dont-email.me> <vtguc4$35l1r$5@dont-email.me>
 <vth304$3ikdg$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net MmR4EzlAUgZxUtZ8SI38lgYRhtq2W0g44azdvgfP09IDQF8/0o
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+bWvgXO/jqXCmHqCxAtrXky+m1w= sha256:0q8KKDfHmA+1r9e9JsJP21FHT4vOb+qPWxobP72/2mE=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
In-Reply-To: <vth304$3ikdg$1@dont-email.me>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250413-8, 4/13/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 3434

Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>> On 2025-04-13 12:38 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>> On 4/13/2025 12:11 PM, suzeeq wrote:
>>>> On 4/12/2025 9:32 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>> Robin Miller <robin.miller@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> 
>>>>>>> I despise Khalil. He's espousing anti-Western and anti-Israeli
>>>>>>> values and is acting, effectively, as a spokesman for Hamas, It's
>>>>>>> a misrepresentation to call him "pro Palestinian" as taking the
>>>>>>> Hamas side is anti-Palestinian.
> 
>>>>>> These are all lies. Khalil's position is to oppose Israel's genocide in
>>>>>> Gaza, which is the only moral position to take. Numerous Jewish groups
>>>>>> have taken the same position; Jewish groups have often led campus
>>>>>> protests. Anyone who supports Israel in its genocide is siding with
>>>>>> ideological descendants of Nazis.
> 
>>>>> I'm not going to bother to raise the usual counterarguments, which
>>>>> you've obviously rejected.
> 
>>>>> Ok, Robin. I'll take it as you intended, that you've told me to go fuck
>>>>> myself. I shall comply. Permanently.
> 
>>>> I don't that's what she intended.
> 
>>> ...nor what Adam intends.
>   
>> Oh happy day! suzee and moviePig are here to tell us what Robin and Adam
>> REALLY meant!
> 
> People mean what they've written. It's not subject to reinterpretation
> by others.
> 
> I didn't think Robin and I were being subtle in any way and I didn't
> think I had to explain Usenet 101.
> 
> I'll continue to post what I like but I won't force myself on those who
> won't have a discussion by following up to what they've written. Anyone
> is free to tell me to fuck off; I'll respect their wishes.
> 
> Robin can use outrageous rhetoric and vitriol in followup to my articles. I
> don't have to like it. I'd have preferred that she made an argument
> so that we could have had discussion, but how she follows up to me is
> her choice. As she doesn't want to have a discussion with me, then I'll
> respect her wishes and stop following up to her.
> 


I don't do Internet debates because they're like a dog chasing its 
tail--they don't accomplish anything.

That said, I felt I had to respond to an argument that I viewed as 
dangerous and outrageous.

--Robin