Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing?
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 05:58:05 +0200
Lines: 66
Message-ID: <m63fctFqo98U2@mid.individual.net>
References: <67EF682D.135A@ix.netcom.com> <67F01AE8.5A1A@ix.netcom.com>
 <67F04BF8.F9C@ix.netcom.com> <67F173B4.DC@ix.netcom.com>
 <e196baed039a0b3096885dd026bc319a@www.novabbs.com>
 <1rakhfg.vqrsfd2xnf4mN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
 <8309cf9411b3d1fb6990a61dbcac02b9@www.novabbs.com>
 <vt8eja$2vhnd$2@dont-email.me> <m5rn1nFj157U5@mid.individual.net>
 <1ramdrp.6j8jyps41hq0N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
 <vtblj2$28dbm$1@dont-email.me> <m5unm2F36ttU6@mid.individual.net>
 <vtdfsf$9bus$1@dont-email.me> <m616brFfdkbU4@mid.individual.net>
 <4uCcnU5A9ptN7Wb6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net Ji4Mbrk0sqvKjZIEYRUAOgwcXtOeLRI/1KxLtSNG6WuWetK7N/
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DuaaUlVYsRpF7Cb8RhH4zvQPGDE= sha256:le4Mo2hTyD036SRmRwXucol+nBirllI1yno1OwetNlQ=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <4uCcnU5A9ptN7Wb6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Bytes: 3575

Am Sonntag000013, 13.04.2025 um 10:07 schrieb Ross Finlayson:
> On 04/13/2025 12:11 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
>> Am Samstag000012, 12.04.2025 um 12:39 schrieb Bobbie Bakhvalov:
>>> Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm an engineer from education and had no personal contacts to the
>>>> physics department. So: possibly they speak in a different idiom than
>>>> engineers do.
>>>>
>>>> To me the title 'moving bodies' (combined with 'electric forces') 
>>>> sounds
>>>> like a synonym for 'sex'.
>>>> ...
>>>
>>> since you are engineer neither. Ever heard of a blackbody in your 
>>> area of
>>> interest?..
>>
>> Actually you are right, because I'm not an engineer by profession.
>>
>> But I own a very nice document from the university 'TU-Berlin', which
>> grants the academic degree 'Dipl.-Ing.' to me.
>>
>> Therefore I'm allowed to use 'Dipl.-Ing.' on all letters that I write. I
>> could also write that on my door-bell (if I wanted to, what I didn't).
>>
>> About 'blackbody radiation' I have heard before.
>>
>> Most of the relevant equations I could write down here, without looking
>> them up.
>>
>>
>> Why I think, that Einstein's title is 'mocking'?
>>
>> Well, I conducted extensive studies on that particular paper and found,
>> that article is really bad and FULL of errors.
>>
>> The number of errors is sooooo large, that they cannot be explained as
>> mistakes, but another explanation is required.
>>
>> This would be im my opinion an intentional offense ('mocking'), to which
>> the title would be the 'cherry on the cake'.
>>
>>
>> TH
> 
> Maybe he was just suffering through a language barrier.

Well, Einstein was German and wrote in German, hence there was no 
'language barrier'.

> 
> Einstein developed a lot. Definitely there are differences early
> Einstein and later Einstein. I contrast that with myself, having a very
> coherent narrative since I was very versed in all the super-classical
> theories then set loose on modern mathematics and premier physics.

Sure, he developed and became a much better physicist.

But I'm talking about a certain paper from 1905, when Einstein was 26.

....


TH