Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<m63fctFqo98U2@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Why does the universe go to all the bother of existing? Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 05:58:05 +0200 Lines: 66 Message-ID: <m63fctFqo98U2@mid.individual.net> References: <67EF682D.135A@ix.netcom.com> <67F01AE8.5A1A@ix.netcom.com> <67F04BF8.F9C@ix.netcom.com> <67F173B4.DC@ix.netcom.com> <e196baed039a0b3096885dd026bc319a@www.novabbs.com> <1rakhfg.vqrsfd2xnf4mN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <8309cf9411b3d1fb6990a61dbcac02b9@www.novabbs.com> <vt8eja$2vhnd$2@dont-email.me> <m5rn1nFj157U5@mid.individual.net> <1ramdrp.6j8jyps41hq0N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <vtblj2$28dbm$1@dont-email.me> <m5unm2F36ttU6@mid.individual.net> <vtdfsf$9bus$1@dont-email.me> <m616brFfdkbU4@mid.individual.net> <4uCcnU5A9ptN7Wb6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net Ji4Mbrk0sqvKjZIEYRUAOgwcXtOeLRI/1KxLtSNG6WuWetK7N/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:DuaaUlVYsRpF7Cb8RhH4zvQPGDE= sha256:le4Mo2hTyD036SRmRwXucol+nBirllI1yno1OwetNlQ= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: de-DE In-Reply-To: <4uCcnU5A9ptN7Wb6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> Am Sonntag000013, 13.04.2025 um 10:07 schrieb Ross Finlayson: > On 04/13/2025 12:11 AM, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am Samstag000012, 12.04.2025 um 12:39 schrieb Bobbie Bakhvalov: >>> Thomas Heger wrote: >>> >>>> I'm an engineer from education and had no personal contacts to the >>>> physics department. So: possibly they speak in a different idiom than >>>> engineers do. >>>> >>>> To me the title 'moving bodies' (combined with 'electric forces') >>>> sounds >>>> like a synonym for 'sex'. >>>> ... >>> >>> since you are engineer neither. Ever heard of a blackbody in your >>> area of >>> interest?.. >> >> Actually you are right, because I'm not an engineer by profession. >> >> But I own a very nice document from the university 'TU-Berlin', which >> grants the academic degree 'Dipl.-Ing.' to me. >> >> Therefore I'm allowed to use 'Dipl.-Ing.' on all letters that I write. I >> could also write that on my door-bell (if I wanted to, what I didn't). >> >> About 'blackbody radiation' I have heard before. >> >> Most of the relevant equations I could write down here, without looking >> them up. >> >> >> Why I think, that Einstein's title is 'mocking'? >> >> Well, I conducted extensive studies on that particular paper and found, >> that article is really bad and FULL of errors. >> >> The number of errors is sooooo large, that they cannot be explained as >> mistakes, but another explanation is required. >> >> This would be im my opinion an intentional offense ('mocking'), to which >> the title would be the 'cherry on the cake'. >> >> >> TH > > Maybe he was just suffering through a language barrier. Well, Einstein was German and wrote in German, hence there was no 'language barrier'. > > Einstein developed a lot. Definitely there are differences early > Einstein and later Einstein. I contrast that with myself, having a very > coherent narrative since I was very versed in all the super-classical > theories then set loose on modern mathematics and premier physics. Sure, he developed and became a much better physicist. But I'm talking about a certain paper from 1905, when Einstein was 26. .... TH