| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<m773jdFj9p6U2@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: silca and Tariffs
Date: 27 Apr 2025 16:16:45 GMT
Lines: 88
Message-ID: <m773jdFj9p6U2@mid.individual.net>
References: <m73mf4F2j52U1@mid.individual.net>
<ql6q0k18aqn8e6e5ptahus7kcv5knler3f@4ax.com>
<vujar7$30jrt$1@dont-email.me>
<m74sm6F8hs2U2@mid.individual.net>
<vujgqu$35deg$2@dont-email.me>
<m750ffF946kU1@mid.individual.net>
<vulgh6$10vvq$3@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net TOSk0lZNFWphErK1JsTrTA3IJ6Rv+1aCs4PrMairF8X3dXHrqg
Cancel-Lock: sha1:O0mNCs2Y20SB8gNBwW+2RBMOFtY= sha1:pq0KAmSH+s5hCsjH3x+yntgbbqQ= sha256:2JGQihwrQ7z0r/vebcCyr17g+VFiEtRnmj/z0nxe3B8=
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Bytes: 4372
AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
> On 4/26/2025 4:11 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
>> AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>>> On 4/26/2025 3:06 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
>>>> AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>>>>> On 4/26/2025 12:41 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
>>>>>> On 26 Apr 2025 09:14:12 GMT, Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://youtu.be/VKz5J5PPt-Q?si=ntPrbZPhCguTIuQM>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Josh of Silca does a good job of explaining how the tariffs are effecting
>>>>>>> US companies certainly small ones, as ever it’s a moving target so may well
>>>>>>> change.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Roger Merriman
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Many countries have tariffs on products from the USA. I see no reason
>>>>>> why the USA shouldn't have tariffs on their products. Maybe it will
>>>>>> bring manufacturing back, maybe not. The USA used to be a
>>>>>> manufacturing powerhouse and the bureaucratic jackasses let it slip
>>>>>> away. I don't know if Trump's plans can save the country, but it was
>>>>>> definatly going to hell with the same old, same old plans. At least
>>>>>> he's trying something new.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> C'est bon
>>>>>> Soloman
>>>>>
>>>>> I am in complete agreement on the importance and benefit of
>>>>> removing disparate tariffs.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't agree that it will make a significant difference in
>>>>> industrial production. With our Byzantine regulations, bans,
>>>>> permits, reviews and so on, plus unions, and a combination
>>>>> of apathy and lack of skills in younger generations ('don't
>>>>> know. don't care') there's no obvious path to refining our
>>>>> huge stores of rare earths, making steel from our excellent
>>>>> iron ore and coking coal, building ships once more or a
>>>>> gazillion other lost industrial projects.
>>>>
>>>> Europe seems to have kept a bit more of its industrial base, and plenty of
>>>> regulations and unions, French in particular do like a good strike!
>>>>
>>>> Europe and Us have lost a most of their industrial capacity, for largely
>>>> cost reasons, though some industries remain such as military.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reciprocal tariffs are good, and moral, but the effect will
>>>>> be about the same as increasing the oceans' volume by
>>>>> pissing in them.
>>>>>
>>>> This isn’t reciprocal but a trade war with China, which is a PR wonder for
>>>> the Chinese government as they can blame you now, ie the US for any
>>>> problems.
>>>>
>>>> Roger Merriman
>>>>
>>>
>>> There are many factors, domestic and foreign. The results
>>> have become critical:
>>>
>>> https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/uk-steel-decades-of-decline/
>>>
>>
>> Uk privatised services companies be that steel or otherwise are deeply
>> unpopular and the general desire for nationalisation is there.
>>
>> Governments have let the free markets be rather too free for various
>> reasons some ideological some political short term gains.
>>
>> But it’s deeply unpopular now, last government essentially asset stripped
>> the country!
>>
>> Roger Merriman
>>
>>
>>
>
> A state owned/managed steel maker? Check the history of that.
>
In name only was bought out few years back and is privately and non uk
owned i forget who but clearly shouldn’t have been left to the only one,
for all sorts of good national interests.
Roger Merriman