Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<m7egu8Fott2U1@mid.individual.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: No Observable Twin Paradox in GPS
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 19:47:20 +0800
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <m7egu8Fott2U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <12f133958856eca2ee609a9b86065e97@www.novabbs.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net CVatkQntzqaCeX5Ma9qQ8g63UK30xX22vyAV1/eUW9kko+hIQ5
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1RVt+7i/MZzoNd2wyxa8XKLLKcQ= sha256:Eurl2oJU//lruz95CVrPwxHzt3pXwZ4gtfWQMe49c1E=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.15.1
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <12f133958856eca2ee609a9b86065e97@www.novabbs.com>
Bytes: 1321

On 30-Apr-25 10:02 am, rhertz wrote:
> Despite SR being touted as critical for GPS, there's no observable time
> dilation between two satellites moving at the same speed in opposite
> directions, as the twin paradox would suggest.

The issue is not between the rates for different satellites, but for the 
rates between each satellite and an observer on the ground.

Sylvia.