Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<m7egu8Fott2U1@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: No Observable Twin Paradox in GPS Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 19:47:20 +0800 Lines: 9 Message-ID: <m7egu8Fott2U1@mid.individual.net> References: <12f133958856eca2ee609a9b86065e97@www.novabbs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net CVatkQntzqaCeX5Ma9qQ8g63UK30xX22vyAV1/eUW9kko+hIQ5 Cancel-Lock: sha1:1RVt+7i/MZzoNd2wyxa8XKLLKcQ= sha256:Eurl2oJU//lruz95CVrPwxHzt3pXwZ4gtfWQMe49c1E= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <12f133958856eca2ee609a9b86065e97@www.novabbs.com> Bytes: 1321 On 30-Apr-25 10:02 am, rhertz wrote: > Despite SR being touted as critical for GPS, there's no observable time > dilation between two satellites moving at the same speed in opposite > directions, as the twin paradox would suggest. The issue is not between the rates for different satellites, but for the rates between each satellite and an observer on the ground. Sylvia.