| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<m7sg4mF1lm0U3@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Fedora proposing to remove X11 Gnome Date: 5 May 2025 18:59:35 GMT Lines: 13 Message-ID: <m7sg4mF1lm0U3@mid.individual.net> References: <oG5OP.1820195$BrX.647879@fx12.iad> <thep0k1b5pb11jcp73kr5gjqvl45oeif77@4ax.com> <slrn100pf9j.5dh.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <gpcs0kdouuo45fjagkfuk37krrjof4rk8i@4ax.com> <slrn100uqg1.ju6.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <vuper1$pu5b$12@dont-email.me> <364QP.125792$oJg.4439@fx17.iad> <slrn1011nb7.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <ZW5QP.125793$oJg.79971@fx17.iad> <slrn1013uil.1aev.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <hmpQP.125857$0qs5.26756@fx07.iad> <slrn10170g7.2qk.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <0OSQP.28898$AoB5.17918@fx09.iad> <slrn1019om7.2rt.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <Rw5RP.1019$dJ7a.260@fx13.iad> <slrn101anpr.3om.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <MedRP.2$_ogc.1@fx03.iad> <slrn101aqp7.7mc.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <s7fRP.3$jny7.2@fx48.iad> <slrn101btj0.6df.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <YUpRP.53707$0jW7.6686@fx09.iad> <slrn101eets.be1.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <slrn101ggon.aov8.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home> <Tg2SP.78081$f6Vd.69306@fx11.iad> <m7s9frFgvlU2@mid.individual.net> <_47SP.53276$XRRd.49895@fx10.iad> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net qyAppqpvXwOOx0q/ikt1ggqhubKmlQ85tH3aqVW8Hp6yz7vKVj Cancel-Lock: sha1:odpyHtIfnxkEgaXIl5X2X/+HNcY= sha256:WyeJhfrrxn63CPKVHinqIN/1FaxNZrsvtsPOAybOzvQ= User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) On Mon, 5 May 2025 14:04:42 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote: > I wasn't a big fan of the book either and thought the movie was awful. > The TV show seemed to be okay from the limited exposure I got to it. > Either way, you were at the very beginning of the story. I only checked > out the story because I was told that it was science fiction genius, but > I guess it was a very different time when that applied. I enjoyed Terry Pratchett's books and Tolkein was okay but most British sci-fi doesn't do it for me like Gaiman's 'Good Omens' or the whole 'Doctor Who' thing. I think it's the attempts at humor. Benny Hill, Doc Martin, Monty Python, and so forth didn't impress me either. There seems to be a tendency to take what might be a funny gag and beat it to death.