| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<m9pqvoFnrcsU1@mid.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: bill <bill.gunshannon@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.vms Subject: Re: Upcoming time boundary events Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 21:18:42 -0400 Lines: 33 Message-ID: <m9pqvoFnrcsU1@mid.individual.net> References: <100fp4v$1nmtf$1@dont-email.me> <100omli$3t023$1@dont-email.me> <100qdop$6q13$1@dont-email.me> <100qg5t$3jb0$1@dont-email.me> <1014ad8$2jurh$1@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net nWE9v+C/33gKrt2QbhUDmAVRwEcwXX4xmiRW1IPDsJDPG2I3gl Cancel-Lock: sha1:Pqt/CwCTNTa/acMpXLD1q9UHqL8= sha256:v+v8F126T1z/WhvS8/QMitIWOfK6Nn49cIbhlM9zHc8= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <1014ad8$2jurh$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2150 On 5/27/2025 8:15 AM, Simon Clubley wrote: > On 2025-05-23, Robert A. Brooks <FIRST.LAST@vmssoftware.com> wrote: >> On 5/23/2025 14:11, Simon Clubley wrote: >> >>> The details are vague since it's been several years since I looked at >>> DECnet Phase IV, but there's a signed integer delta date field somewhere >>> in DECnet Phase IV (from a base date offset) that overflowed, at least >>> if you followed the spec, in 2021 (IIRC). I do remember that VMS treated >>> it as an unsigned integer, hence VMS wasn't affected. >>> >>> I _think_ it was in EVL, but I can't be sure now. >> >> I fixed that one; it'll be good until my 100th birthday. >> > > $ set response/mode=good_natured > > I wonder if people will have stopped using DECnet Phase IV by then ? :-) > > These old protocols have a habit of staying around a lot longer than > expected. For example, I suspect somewhere people are still using UUCP, > 2780/3780, xmodem, DDCMP, original SNA (not SNA over TCP/IP), etc, ... > > I wonder how old you have to be to recognise any of the above these days ? :-) > There is still a UUCP network. It runs over the internet rather than the phone system but it runs the UUCP protocol. bill