Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: bill <bill.gunshannon@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: Re: Upcoming time boundary events
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 20:24:41 -0400
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <m9sc6fFnrcsU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <100fp4v$1nmtf$1@dont-email.me> <100omli$3t023$1@dont-email.me>
 <100qdop$6q13$1@dont-email.me> <100qg5t$3jb0$1@dont-email.me>
 <1014ad8$2jurh$1@dont-email.me> <m9pqvoFnrcsU1@mid.individual.net>
 <874ix3np14.fsf@atr2.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net jPEyB2cK3i4OTR7TWprmiApxbCF98x7m4XetaK3MPCAZFCDSEY
Cancel-Lock: sha1:emIziQKh0WVH5CGBDAtGF8z/Xiw= sha256:qFJu1Lt8MJA2ct5gKB1GOoF7MTQym0/cVNdyO8jAhXk=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <874ix3np14.fsf@atr2.ath.cx>
Bytes: 2220

On 5/29/2025 4:24 PM, jayjwa wrote:
> bill <bill.gunshannon@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> There is still a UUCP network.  It runs over the internet rather than
>> the phone system but it runs the UUCP protocol.
> Or emulated serial lines.
> 
> https://www.digiater.nl/openvms/decus/vax92a/uucp/
> 
> ❰jayjwa❙~❱✔≻ rlogin kirin
> 
> $ mail
> 
> MAIL> send
> To:	uucp%"atr2!jayjwa"
> Subj:	UUCP
> Enter your message below. Press CTRL/Z when complete, or CTRL/C to quit:
> Can you believe that people are still using UUCP?
>   Exit
> 
> MAIL> exit
> $ logout
> rlogin: Connection to kirin closed normally.26:35.15
> ❰jayjwa❙~❱✔≻ mailx
> mailx version v14.9.25.  Type `?' for help
> /var/spool/mail/jayjwa: 2 messages 1 new
>   O  1 Mail System Intern 2025-05-29 11:12   13/536   DON'T DELETE THIS MESSAGE -- FOLDER INTERNAL DATA
> ▸N  2 jayjwa@kirin.lan   2025-05-29 11:26   21/891   UUCP
> ? 2
> [-- Message  2 -- 21 lines, 891 bytes --]:
> Date: Thu, 29 May 25 15:26:30 EDT
> Message-Id: <00BAB43684479760.00000237@kirin.lan>
> From: jayjwa@kirin.lan
> Subject: UUCP
> To: jayjwa@atr2.lan
> 
> Can you believe that people are still using UUCP?
> 
> ?
> 


Can you believe people are still using DECNET?  :-)

bill