Path: ...!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 09:17:13 +0000
Subject: Re: The HOAX of the neutrino invention. After 95 years don't know
 shit.
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <0dd990630edbc9332716605722eb087a@www.novabbs.com>
 <uzOdnSyHj7_9z3r6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 02:17:16 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <uzOdnSyHj7_9z3r6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <mECdnd2OzKyEkXT6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 141
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-DTmK3ck0O+NwxUQs55n2HEwlmtTorPl74BfUll3XKu5HT1jdpbNNUMG/EZSklrrtl3ADa1moOEdU+7N!pCNasStC74vNqBJ3rcLsu60oR/BiS0RS7JjM7EpKRb9ah7aIBY1274XwgLknF6vQwJyFNsar5pc=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 7984

On 03/28/2025 06:52 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 03/28/2025 05:50 PM, rhertz wrote:
>> In 1930 Wolfgang Pauli  proposed the existence of the neutrino (named in
>> 1933 by Fermi) to solve the violation of energy conservation in beta
>> decay (when a neutron turns into a proton and emits an electron).
>> Scientists observed that the emitted electrons had varying energies,
>> rather than a fixed value as expected. The neutrino was ALLEGEDLY
>> detected experimentally by Cowan and Reines in 1956.
>>
>> The missing energy varied from 0.1 to 0.2 eV (millions of times lower
>> than electrons at rest). Pauli assumed that neutrinos might be massless,
>> like photons, and this kept in the '70s, with the Standard Model
>> (1970s). Analysis from Solar Neutrinos (1960s–2001) suggested that
>> neutrinos oscillate, wich (de Broglie) require mass.
>>
>> Up to date, the neutinos mass is UNKNOWN. As neutrinos proved to be the
>> JOKER CARD of particle physics, different types of neutrino emerged
>> since its invention TO JUSTIFY the conservation of energy. All three of
>> them were asigned a spin of 1/2 in the Standard Model, only for
>> equations involving SMEP charged particles. They are; Electron neutrino
>> (< 2.2 eV), Muon neutrino (< 0.17 eV) and Tau neutrino (< 15.5 MeV). The
>> energies ARE STILL NOT KNOWN (so their mass, IF THEY HAVE IT AT ALL).
>>
>> Two collosal experiments have been developed to capture neutrinos, at
>> the expense of tens of billions of USD. One of these collosus is the
>> Japanese Super-Kamiokande (see attached pic), which uses ultrapure
>> water. The other one is the IceCube arrangement, located inside the
>> Antarctic ice. IceCube was designed to CAPTURE ultra-high-energy cosmic
>> neutrinos, while the Super-K is designed to CAPTURE solar, atmospheric,
>> and accelerator neutrinos, which are much less energetic.
>>
>> The concept behind the CAPTURE of neutrinos is strictly based on the
>> emission of Cherenkov radiation (blue light flash), when they penetrate
>> water or ice, because its speed would be faster than light in those
>> enviroments, so they have to subside energy (Cerenkov discovered this
>> 100 years ago).
>>
>> The PROBLEM with neutrinos is that they don't like to interact with
>> matter. ALLEGEDLY (if neutrinos really exist), the probability to detect
>> ONE NEUTRINO PER YEAR, at the Japanese Super-K is:
>>
>> ONE IN 10,000,000,000,000,000
>>
>> Or about 5,000 to 10,000 neutrinos "detected by the Cherenkov blue flash
>> over 10^20 neutrinos per year entering into the Super-Kamiokande
>> (Super-K). It means about 10 to 20 neutrinos per day.
>>
>> How the neutrinos "ARE DETECTED"?: Super-K uses a cylindrical stainless
>> steel tank, 41.4 meters tall × 39.3 meters in diameter (like a 13-story
>> building buried underground). It contains the inner  Super-K
>> (36-meter-tall × 34-meter-diameter) is filled with 50,000-ton ultrapure
>> water.
>>
>> Super-K uses 11,129 photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) to capture the
>> Cherenkov blue flashes that form a cone of light as it decreases its
>> speed at about 0.7c. The PMTs are extremely fragile and are placed side
>> by side in all the internal surface. If one explodes, a chain reaction
>> happens that destroy most of the other PMT.
>>
>> The PMT MUST BE SUPERSENSITIVE because they only can capture few photons
>> of the light cone, as the neutrinos penetrates into the Super-K volume.
>> The FLASH can happen at any depth, because neutrinos have to interact
>> with binding energies in the nucleus of atoms to be detected. PMTs have
>> few nanoseconds to detect the arrival times of photons. A solar neutrino
>> (from the Sun) interacts in the water, creating an electron, which is
>> the one that emits Cherenkov light, hitting about 100 PMTs. The output
>> of the PMTs raise the energy close to 5 MeV, after which software
>> processing complete the calculations.
>>
>> One additional narrative is the existence of antineutrinos, which are
>> (allegedly) distinguished in the Super-K.
>>
>> The most important facts are:
>>
>> *  Neutrinos must have mass, but IT IS NOT KNOWN YET.
>>
>> * Only a difference in alleged masses of the three types of neutrinos is
>> known, BUT ONLY BECAUSE the detected oscillations are different.
>>
>> * Since they are emitted (i.e. by the Sun), neutrinos change (mutate)
>> from one type to the other (or scientists allege to).
>>
>> * The mutations are originated (as they say) due to mechanisms:
>>
>> **** Seesaw Mechanism: Heavy right-handed neutrinos suppress left-handed
>> neutrino masses.
>>
>> *** Dirac vs. Majorana: If neutrinos are their own antiparticles
>> (Majorana), their mass could arise from exotic processes.
>>
>> MY CONCLUSION: Physics needs that neutrinos REALLY EXIST, otherwise the
>> law of conservation of energy is violated. How neutrinos are generated
>> IS UNKNOWN. If neutrinos have mass or not IS UNKNOWN. Tens of billions
>> of USD wasted for nothing, as the confusion in physics increase with
>> each generation of geniuses proposing contradictory ideas. The existence
>> of cosmic neutrinos is essential in astrophysics to FILL THE VOID in
>> calculations. Also, in cosmology, their role is essential for such
>> unproven theories like the BB.
>>
>> I smell a rotten fish around this.
>>
>> Meanwhile, physicists making six figures plus expenses are more than
>> happy, and have zero accountability.
>>
>> HOAX!
>
>
> You forgot the Baikal detector at the other end of
> the line of the Batavia-Baikal neutrinophone.
>
>
> Neutrinos are simply whatever is superluminal flux,
> when gravity's speed is infinite and light's is not,
> and in the nuclear sector with Cerenkov/Brehmsstrahlung.
>
> Don't you know there are three super-symmetries after
> electron physics for muon, hadron (the most popular by far),
> and neutrino physics?
>
>
> It is so that many "physicists" today are "weak SR-ians"
> and that's their limits and others don't know that nucleon
> theory and hadron theory are different, and pretty much
> dealing with their force/field as a model of motion of point/space
> as "energy" absent "entelechy" and a continuous manifold of
> space-time, is just a technician.
>
>
> You need a super-classical model of motion if you're
> going to, get anywhere, as it were.
>
>


Wow, it sort of seems like you don't know much about
the tetrad of quantities nor that relativity is a very
simple theory, then that particle/wave duality and the
wave/resonance dichotomy must be more or less that
the connection to continuum mechanics is incongruous,
to you.