Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 09:20:44 +0000
Subject: Re: Modern cosmology's crises
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <VsOdnVcJzYL7-Eb6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <275242e2-da59-3275-b400-095ab415bb99@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>
 <19-cnf9wl_MIHXz6nZ2dnZfqnPoAAAAA@giganews.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 02:20:47 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <19-cnf9wl_MIHXz6nZ2dnZfqnPoAAAAA@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <mECdndyOzKxxkXT6nZ2dnZfqn_UAAAAA@giganews.com>
Lines: 58
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-zKOhtIzq+1sgmuMV+MEfxbqQvy3jIta4izBOYl3IQrl5H1dmK/jJyiEP6y/zpJ7UCU3D1cOpnBJL3Y3!PipRDsWTo9Hvx4HXu44bn2IdCqpZNi6HeFI6cAVtFGGbbc2f56TNA6GU8CsrhaamY/Ld5c7kwE0=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3489

On 03/24/2025 08:55 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 03/24/2025 06:26 AM, jojo wrote:
>> Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>> Articles these days about inflationary cosmology,
>>> "well we don't understand apparent galaxies holding
>>> together and call it dark matter, and don't understand
>>> apparent galaxies falling apart and call it dark energy,
>>> and instead of figuring out rotational freedom and
>>> a different linear and rotational to explain what's
>>> called dark matter, and instead of figuring out redshift bias
>>> and that most of the sky survey was just a large local jet
>>> to explain dark energy, now we'll just say that the universe
>>> in the long past simply had entirely opposite laws".
>>>
>>> Trading a non-scientific explanation of a non-scientific
>>> explanation for a non-scientific explanation.
>>>
>>> It's like that one new theory last year, "wobbly bits",
>>> sort of instead of "wobbly bits", just a giant "wobbly bend".
>>>
>>> And those g2 log-linear goofs, ....
>>>
>>>
>>> If it was honest scientific reporting it'd say "modern cosmology
>>> is in a crisis since the decades since non-scientific un-explanations".
>>>
>>>
>>> Of course a simple difference linear/rotational all the way
>>> down in classical mechanics and then the optical character
>>> of optical light and redshift bias provide mechanism and
>>> explanation, and events like lunar eclipses, or spiral footballs
>>> or gyroscopic action, demonstrate the super-classical optical
>>> and retro-classical mechanical.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So anyways "scientific reporting" painting itself in pretty
>>> terms is, not so scientific after all.
>>
>>
>> more observations and data needed, i suppose. there are new telescopes
>> coming online in the next few years that will try to deal with dark
>> matter.
>>
>
> No, "dark matter" at all falsified Newtonian and Einsteinian theories
> of gravity as with regards to all measurements in the galactic.
>
> When it hit six and seven sigmas then it was definitely long past
> significant.
>
> Now, saying that's not so: is in-significant.
>
>

So, everyone appreciates that the premier theories are TOAST.