Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<mNacAS-npWdWRghJ9nweTeA9hdM@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <mNacAS-npWdWRghJ9nweTeA9hdM@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: "Time" vs "physical time" References: <17e914f508c7a9cf$96455$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <dwvnP-SoKZPwHpz6HgPhxwtG7e4@jntp> <v92ugo$4cam$1@dont-email.me> <XhF-ilyxW2WRkQK5uYxoOVgm1rU@jntp> <v98g6k$srl7$1@dont-email.me> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: x1LasLTucU24w-Lw1GrZ-rMPjRk JNTP-ThreadID: 17e914f508c7a9cf$96455$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=mNacAS-npWdWRghJ9nweTeA9hdM@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Sat, 10 Aug 24 21:05:04 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-08-10T21:05:04Z/8982306"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr> Bytes: 2581 Lines: 30 Le 10/08/2024 à 21:48, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit : > >> L= 13.2.10^5m >> c=3.10^8m/s >> (1/c)=3.333ns/m >> There exists, between Paris and Oslo (the notion of universal present >> time being finally understood as ridiculous and abstract in any inertial >> frame of reference) a reciprocal delay of information, of real present >> of universe, of ΔTo=4.44ms during a synchronization that nevertheless >> appears perfectly established. > > Is this an incredible convoluted attempt to say that the transit time > for light to go through the tunnel from Oslo to Paris or vice versa > is ≈ 4.44 ms ? > > What is ridiculous about this simple fact? > > > Paul Yes and no. If a professor of Newtonian physics asks Richard Hachel the question: "How long will it take for light to cross the tunnel and go from Paris to Oslo, or from Oslo to Paris?". He will be answered 4.44ms. If a professor of quantum physics asks the same question, Dr. Hachel (because he is crazy) will answer: "Both 8.88ms and 0 ms." And all three answers will be correct. R.H.