Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <mNiC4ckH7eGVkAu2K88S6TUWj3E@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Does the number of nines =?UTF-8?Q?increase=3F?=
References: <tJf9P9dALSN4l2XH5vdqPbXSA7o@jntp> <e3ZDe1OozyaPv_8HZy_kTDZtHJk@jntp> <v6spao$3diun$2@dont-email.me>
 <d6yZRpOl38J4dqE-n_qqzplqNmQ@jntp> <v6ul15$3ni5h$1@dont-email.me> <79JoZp5bHCH4hf4J9cxbLGeMvPE@jntp>
 <v70pd4$6n41$1@dont-email.me> <vv6K_9idTUEwX3W3ECn0Z9xK6Uk@jntp> <74edd85cf4bdd0aecaee742ef35763e9d9dc8741@i2pn2.org>
 <v745vl$skrg$1@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.math
JNTP-HashClient: smLHb2qU0rWPIBRHcLcf5sw5Mp8
JNTP-ThreadID: 0JbXgoRqYUfKvvWhEBWZVJgnda4
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=mNiC4ckH7eGVkAu2K88S6TUWj3E@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 24 13:21:57 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="82b75c1d0a83e677ff646b52485f72f8b23749df"; logging-data="2024-07-16T13:21:57Z/8950839"; posting-account="217@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Bytes: 2195
Lines: 18

Le 15/07/2024 à 23:57, Moebius a écrit :
> Am 15.07.2024 um 15:33 schrieb joes:

>> As has been repeated, there is no single fixed number less than all/every
>> other number. However, every number has a smaller one.

That is potential infinity.
> 
> Wie schon ein paar Mal (also ein paar 100-mal) erwähnt, scheint 
> Mückenheim nicht fähig (oder gewillt) zu sein, zwischen
> 
>        Ax Ey (y < x)

That is potential infinity. There is no smallest y.
In actual infinity there are all points including the smallest unit 
fraction. It is not necessary to construct them by naming some larger x.

Regards, WM