Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <mQVs9WESvMpUru40MqXiOAmJPYU@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?Q?y=3Dsqrt=28x=29+=32?=
References: <bVBot-wAXaI3A0yea6LF5csVqXs@jntp> <394c3f22755f7131e2210c3b65bb0a206adc6ebe@i2pn2.org>
 <tobXdREkfFMvlACbFLCz_Zra-IY@jntp> <065d347ad580522ff7ebab528160a05c5b2d026f@i2pn2.org>
 <2kD0TKLc9Iu-ltAo10v6f_pL93Q@jntp> <votj2m$okls$1@dont-email.me> <wu5XToWMQpamnhUp44J3pitOaQk@jntp>
 <905f4ae36db91c09ccfe729da7b07894bdcb70ad@i2pn2.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
JNTP-HashClient: 678n-eULHL769faSgH6Cwv8lAbs
JNTP-ThreadID: tk8MPxMqQi3J0SMrDv61PqT7clE
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=mQVs9WESvMpUru40MqXiOAmJPYU@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 25 01:14:38 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="0622b338f00df6c7e122ad5f6ee90645acf995aa"; logging-data="2025-02-17T01:14:38Z/9211750"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr>
Bytes: 3745
Lines: 57

Le 17/02/2025 à 02:08, Richard Damon a écrit :
> On 2/16/25 6:11 PM, Richard Hachel wrote:
>> Le 16/02/2025 à 21:50, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit :
>>> On 2/16/2025 11:04 AM, Richard Hachel wrote:
>>>> Le 16/02/2025 à 19:39, Richard Damon a écrit :
>>>>> On 2/16/25 9:27 AM, Richard Hachel wrote:
>>>>>> Le 16/02/2025 à 02:42, Richard Damon a écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 4 * i^4
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Absolutely.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> J'avais toujours dit que les Richard étaient des êtres exceptionnels.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nota bene:
>>>>>> 4 * i^4 = -4
>>>>>
>>>>> No, i^4 - 1, since i^2 = -1, by definition.
>>>>
>>>> When definitions are incorrect, the definitions should be ignored.
>>>
>>> Go ahead an ignore the complex numbers. Why should we care?
>>>
>>> [...]
>> 
>> That's not what I said.
>> I spoke of "definitions" and not of "matter".
>> I was saying that false and lame definitions should be ignored, and 
>> replaced by truer, clearer, more beautiful definitions.
>> It's not that complex numbers should not be studied, it's that if we 
>> study them, we must study them correctly and with the right definitions.
>> Once that's done, everything that remains can be thrown in the trash.
>> Let's take the very definition of the entity i. Mathematicians propose 
>> definitions so ugly, even false, that it will make future generations 
>> laugh.
>> It is these falsehoods and distortions that deserve to disappear.
>> I said the same thing about special relativity, and I am then considered 
>> in several ways (a madman who denies everything, a crank who destroys 
>> what is good).
>> All this is not very serious on the part of men.
>> N.B. Artificial intelligence can be used to straighten out definitions. 
>> I have already heard it say wonderful things as long as we enter the 
>> right data.
>> 
>> R.H.
> 
> As I tell the other idiots, if you want to change the definitions, go 
> ahead, just don't say you are working in the standard system.
> 
> IF you think the definitons are "false", then you don't understand how 
> formal logic works.
> 
> Sorry, you are just proving your stupidity.

Thank you for your post.

R.H.