Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<mROdnRmNavAt4mz6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 19:08:32 +0000
Subject: Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-)
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math
References: <vrt4e1$bjf1$1@solani.org> <vsbshg$iqvv$1@solani.org>
 <vspetk$pc0h$1@solani.org> <1BidnZeRRtqq-G36nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vsqc6m$prpd$1@solani.org> <Z-Sdnd3r2Zx6z2z6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vsrl23$2mj63$1@dont-email.me> <vsrseg$qfrp$1@solani.org>
 <UoacnWE6O6LF5Wz6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <vsruir$qfrp$2@solani.org>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 12:08:28 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <vsruir$qfrp$2@solani.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <mROdnRmNavAt4mz6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 417
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-hfqYsiNrimB7DeaWmit41CrPIbOrUrZk0bxWzrG6rnRN76zsu3B8JBdG2OkAgeD0S0VShITL2B88QNG!stE5w7fTymiL7EiYC9KX8bDVZxMIGzlIGwpHft3Qs4q38obHaovgU6NWhEbCuVQ5M0VsO0ktb+4=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 19741

On 04/05/2025 11:59 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> On 4/5/25 1:37 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On 04/05/2025 11:23 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>> On 4/5/25 11:16 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>> Ross Finlayson submitted this idea :
>>>>> On 04/04/2025 09:39 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/4/25 6:03 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 04/04/2025 01:20 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A Unified Field Theory of Mathematical Ontology
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They laugh, but they do not see — they never see — that the
>>>>>>>> reconciliation of Platonism and logicist positivism is not only
>>>>>>>> possible
>>>>>>>> but necessary. The vacillations of lesser minds, trapped in the
>>>>>>>> crude
>>>>>>>> positivism of observable facts, blind them to the luminous truth:
>>>>>>>> abstract objects are real, and mathematics is the language of their
>>>>>>>> being.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Vitali sets whisper to me in the night, revealing the
>>>>>>>> fractures in
>>>>>>>> their cherished measure theory. Why do they cling to their null
>>>>>>>> axiom
>>>>>>>> delusions when the transfinite cardinals sing so clearly of a
>>>>>>>> higher
>>>>>>>> order? The anti-diagonal argument is not a refutation but an
>>>>>>>> invitation
>>>>>>>> — a call to transcend the countable and embrace the continuum’s
>>>>>>>> unyielding depth.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Einstein knew GR before SR — yes, yes — the manifold is primary,
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> locality is an illusion woven from their fear of the infinite. The
>>>>>>>> decomposition of fields into classical fragments is a fools’
>>>>>>>> errand; the
>>>>>>>> total field is the only truth. A Physfit's dick. I have seen
>>>>>>>> Physfit's
>>>>>>>> dick in the dance of relativistic nanogyroscopes, their spin
>>>>>>>> echoing the
>>>>>>>> nested intervals of a hypergeometric cosmos. The so-called
>>>>>>>> fictitious
>>>>>>>> forces are no less real than their precious conservation laws —
>>>>>>>> energy
>>>>>>>> flows where it will, fungible and unbound by their linear dogma.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The multipole moment of reality cannot be contained in their
>>>>>>>> truncated
>>>>>>>> Taylor expansions. They call Physfit's dick strange, but who among
>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>> has dared to _uniquify_ the unit interval? Who has heard the
>>>>>>>> ouroboros
>>>>>>>> hiss its eternal truth?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And yet — and yet! — they prattle on about dark matter, about
>>>>>>>> virtual
>>>>>>>> particles, as if these phantoms could patch the holes in their
>>>>>>>> sinking
>>>>>>>> paradigm. The Pauli exclusion principle is but a shadow of a deeper
>>>>>>>> geometry, and their neutrino experiments only scratch the surface
>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>> Physfit's dick - of what must be. The crisis in cosmology is their
>>>>>>>> crisis, not mine. I stand at the threshold, where the Ding-an-Sich
>>>>>>>> meets
>>>>>>>> the N/U EF, where the snake eats its tail in perfect, paradoxical
>>>>>>>> harmony. They will dismiss this, of course. They always do. But
>>>>>>>> when
>>>>>>>> their false theories crumble, when their Zork-like labyrinths
>>>>>>>> collapse
>>>>>>>> into irrelevance, they will remember — Kosmanson saw this! And the
>>>>>>>> stamp
>>>>>>>> of truth, unlike their noise, is forever.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ross A. Kosmanson
>>>>>>>> April 4, 2025
>>>>>>>> Standing at the edge of the Door to Hell, Derweze, Turkmenistan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now sure where you came up with "Zork", though I suppose that it's
>>>>>>> been mentioned a few or half-dozen times in whatever inspired
>>>>>>> Kosmanson.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Otherwise it's nice and not unreasonable, indeed here there's
>>>>>>> interest
>>>>>>> in more of it and if it costs you I could front it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yet, wouldn't Kosmanson emit that regardless, wouldn't he volunteer,
>>>>>>> given Kosmanson's interests, wouldn't he demand "to not be wrong".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The usage of "uniquify", that's a good word, saying anything at all,
>>>>>>> yet, something, at all.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are virtual particles and virtual particles, some are the
>>>>>>> super-symmetric partner particles and, you know, real, while
>>>>>>> others are dots to connect in what must otherwise be not-particles.
>>>>>>> (... Which are valleys or ridges among waves and it's falsifiable
>>>>>>> and demonstrable effects about and around them, or, Feynman on
>>>>>>> the Stern-Gerlach apparatus demands a continuum mechanics.)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> About continuity and line-drawing [0, 1], of course it's one
>>>>>>> of the very oldest of notions and one of Aristotle's continua,
>>>>>>> that there are at least three models of mathematical continuous
>>>>>>> domains, that, each with with their own regularity and ruliality
>>>>>>> of completeness, yet each to each other beyond an inductive impasse,
>>>>>>> have for wider reason and itself rationality, that the repleteness
>>>>>>> of their completeness, has a pre-Cartesian "only-diagonal" and
>>>>>>> then for that the rationals are HUGE, keeping it then altogether
>>>>>>> that in extra-ordinary foundations of mathematics, a MODERN
>>>>>>> mathematics,
>>>>>>> that it rescues modern mathematics from blindness (in its dumbness).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you didn't play Zork in the 80's then I suppose you
>>>>>>> weren't around or didn't have a computer or didn't have
>>>>>>> a copy of Zork. It's a text-based adventure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, I suppose there may be other reasons, though here there's
>>>>>>> that all the reasons and none sort of result at least one.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, I imagine if you let Kosmanson go on then there'd
>>>>>>> be quite more to it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A note about Kosmanson's emphasis on what's often truncated in an
>>>>>> infinite series. A year or so back I was forming baby problems in a
>>>>>> blog
>>>>>> for a Linux newsgroup frequenters to solve, and in one of them one
>>>>>> would
>>>>>> begin with a correct equation, would make correct changes in it, but
>>>>>> would end up in an obviously wrong equation :) Nobody solved it of
>>>>>> course (audience were mostly morons). But I now wonder if that
>>>>>> problem
>>>>>> had something about Kosmanson's concerns about handling infinities.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here I quote the part of the blog that contained that problem:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (beginning of the quote)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    "Then, swoooooooshhshsh!.... and Jesus and all that intense light
>>>>>> went
>>>>>> back up and out of there. Physfit looked up and there wasn't even an
>>>>>> opening in the ceiling anymore. But now for some reason he was
>>>>>> horizontally on the floor, in his bed. Right in the living room!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He thought a bit about what was happening, when he found himself
>>>>>> quite
>>>>>> hungry. Last time he had eaten anything was the night before he had
>>>>>> waken up on the summit of the magic mountain in an urban Dallas area.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He thought to himself, "I'm going to assume that more than 48
>>>>>> hours has
>>>>>> passed since. So got up and walked to the kitchen and took a look
>>>>>> inside
>>>>>> refrigerator. There was nothing there but the cat food he had
>>>>>> cooked on
>>>>>> the day he first saw the magic mountain. He got on the computer to
>>>>>> order
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========