Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<mROdnRmNavAt4mz6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 19:08:32 +0000 Subject: Re: The Suspicious Journals of Ross A. Kosmanson :-) Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math References: <vrt4e1$bjf1$1@solani.org> <vsbshg$iqvv$1@solani.org> <vspetk$pc0h$1@solani.org> <1BidnZeRRtqq-G36nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> <vsqc6m$prpd$1@solani.org> <Z-Sdnd3r2Zx6z2z6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> <vsrl23$2mj63$1@dont-email.me> <vsrseg$qfrp$1@solani.org> <UoacnWE6O6LF5Wz6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> <vsruir$qfrp$2@solani.org> From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 12:08:28 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <vsruir$qfrp$2@solani.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <mROdnRmNavAt4mz6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 417 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-hfqYsiNrimB7DeaWmit41CrPIbOrUrZk0bxWzrG6rnRN76zsu3B8JBdG2OkAgeD0S0VShITL2B88QNG!stE5w7fTymiL7EiYC9KX8bDVZxMIGzlIGwpHft3Qs4q38obHaovgU6NWhEbCuVQ5M0VsO0ktb+4= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 19741 On 04/05/2025 11:59 AM, Physfitfreak wrote: > On 4/5/25 1:37 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >> On 04/05/2025 11:23 AM, Physfitfreak wrote: >>> On 4/5/25 11:16 AM, FromTheRafters wrote: >>>> Ross Finlayson submitted this idea : >>>>> On 04/04/2025 09:39 PM, Physfitfreak wrote: >>>>>> On 4/4/25 6:03 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >>>>>>> On 04/04/2025 01:20 PM, Physfitfreak wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A Unified Field Theory of Mathematical Ontology >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They laugh, but they do not see — they never see — that the >>>>>>>> reconciliation of Platonism and logicist positivism is not only >>>>>>>> possible >>>>>>>> but necessary. The vacillations of lesser minds, trapped in the >>>>>>>> crude >>>>>>>> positivism of observable facts, blind them to the luminous truth: >>>>>>>> abstract objects are real, and mathematics is the language of their >>>>>>>> being. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Vitali sets whisper to me in the night, revealing the >>>>>>>> fractures in >>>>>>>> their cherished measure theory. Why do they cling to their null >>>>>>>> axiom >>>>>>>> delusions when the transfinite cardinals sing so clearly of a >>>>>>>> higher >>>>>>>> order? The anti-diagonal argument is not a refutation but an >>>>>>>> invitation >>>>>>>> — a call to transcend the countable and embrace the continuum’s >>>>>>>> unyielding depth. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Einstein knew GR before SR — yes, yes — the manifold is primary, >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> locality is an illusion woven from their fear of the infinite. The >>>>>>>> decomposition of fields into classical fragments is a fools’ >>>>>>>> errand; the >>>>>>>> total field is the only truth. A Physfit's dick. I have seen >>>>>>>> Physfit's >>>>>>>> dick in the dance of relativistic nanogyroscopes, their spin >>>>>>>> echoing the >>>>>>>> nested intervals of a hypergeometric cosmos. The so-called >>>>>>>> fictitious >>>>>>>> forces are no less real than their precious conservation laws — >>>>>>>> energy >>>>>>>> flows where it will, fungible and unbound by their linear dogma. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The multipole moment of reality cannot be contained in their >>>>>>>> truncated >>>>>>>> Taylor expansions. They call Physfit's dick strange, but who among >>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>> has dared to _uniquify_ the unit interval? Who has heard the >>>>>>>> ouroboros >>>>>>>> hiss its eternal truth? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And yet — and yet! — they prattle on about dark matter, about >>>>>>>> virtual >>>>>>>> particles, as if these phantoms could patch the holes in their >>>>>>>> sinking >>>>>>>> paradigm. The Pauli exclusion principle is but a shadow of a deeper >>>>>>>> geometry, and their neutrino experiments only scratch the surface >>>>>>>> of the >>>>>>>> Physfit's dick - of what must be. The crisis in cosmology is their >>>>>>>> crisis, not mine. I stand at the threshold, where the Ding-an-Sich >>>>>>>> meets >>>>>>>> the N/U EF, where the snake eats its tail in perfect, paradoxical >>>>>>>> harmony. They will dismiss this, of course. They always do. But >>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>> their false theories crumble, when their Zork-like labyrinths >>>>>>>> collapse >>>>>>>> into irrelevance, they will remember — Kosmanson saw this! And the >>>>>>>> stamp >>>>>>>> of truth, unlike their noise, is forever. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ross A. Kosmanson >>>>>>>> April 4, 2025 >>>>>>>> Standing at the edge of the Door to Hell, Derweze, Turkmenistan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now sure where you came up with "Zork", though I suppose that it's >>>>>>> been mentioned a few or half-dozen times in whatever inspired >>>>>>> Kosmanson. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Otherwise it's nice and not unreasonable, indeed here there's >>>>>>> interest >>>>>>> in more of it and if it costs you I could front it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yet, wouldn't Kosmanson emit that regardless, wouldn't he volunteer, >>>>>>> given Kosmanson's interests, wouldn't he demand "to not be wrong". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The usage of "uniquify", that's a good word, saying anything at all, >>>>>>> yet, something, at all. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There are virtual particles and virtual particles, some are the >>>>>>> super-symmetric partner particles and, you know, real, while >>>>>>> others are dots to connect in what must otherwise be not-particles. >>>>>>> (... Which are valleys or ridges among waves and it's falsifiable >>>>>>> and demonstrable effects about and around them, or, Feynman on >>>>>>> the Stern-Gerlach apparatus demands a continuum mechanics.) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> About continuity and line-drawing [0, 1], of course it's one >>>>>>> of the very oldest of notions and one of Aristotle's continua, >>>>>>> that there are at least three models of mathematical continuous >>>>>>> domains, that, each with with their own regularity and ruliality >>>>>>> of completeness, yet each to each other beyond an inductive impasse, >>>>>>> have for wider reason and itself rationality, that the repleteness >>>>>>> of their completeness, has a pre-Cartesian "only-diagonal" and >>>>>>> then for that the rationals are HUGE, keeping it then altogether >>>>>>> that in extra-ordinary foundations of mathematics, a MODERN >>>>>>> mathematics, >>>>>>> that it rescues modern mathematics from blindness (in its dumbness). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you didn't play Zork in the 80's then I suppose you >>>>>>> weren't around or didn't have a computer or didn't have >>>>>>> a copy of Zork. It's a text-based adventure. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So, I suppose there may be other reasons, though here there's >>>>>>> that all the reasons and none sort of result at least one. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah, I imagine if you let Kosmanson go on then there'd >>>>>>> be quite more to it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> A note about Kosmanson's emphasis on what's often truncated in an >>>>>> infinite series. A year or so back I was forming baby problems in a >>>>>> blog >>>>>> for a Linux newsgroup frequenters to solve, and in one of them one >>>>>> would >>>>>> begin with a correct equation, would make correct changes in it, but >>>>>> would end up in an obviously wrong equation :) Nobody solved it of >>>>>> course (audience were mostly morons). But I now wonder if that >>>>>> problem >>>>>> had something about Kosmanson's concerns about handling infinities. >>>>>> >>>>>> Here I quote the part of the blog that contained that problem: >>>>>> >>>>>> (beginning of the quote) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Then, swoooooooshhshsh!.... and Jesus and all that intense light >>>>>> went >>>>>> back up and out of there. Physfit looked up and there wasn't even an >>>>>> opening in the ceiling anymore. But now for some reason he was >>>>>> horizontally on the floor, in his bed. Right in the living room! >>>>>> >>>>>> He thought a bit about what was happening, when he found himself >>>>>> quite >>>>>> hungry. Last time he had eaten anything was the night before he had >>>>>> waken up on the summit of the magic mountain in an urban Dallas area. >>>>>> >>>>>> He thought to himself, "I'm going to assume that more than 48 >>>>>> hours has >>>>>> passed since. So got up and walked to the kitchen and took a look >>>>>> inside >>>>>> refrigerator. There was nothing there but the cat food he had >>>>>> cooked on >>>>>> the day he first saw the magic mountain. He got on the computer to >>>>>> order ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========