Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <m_uze6jFLkrMPuR4XaNmQntFPLY@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: The problem of relativistic synchronisation
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: wPuTS0TraYaeMdo9Dit57FKMVbQ
JNTP-ThreadID: 76aXiNOmFXLuhuEL0ulE9Z2aOsc
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=m_uze6jFLkrMPuR4XaNmQntFPLY@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 24 11:15:38 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-08-23T11:15:38Z/8997454"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr>
Bytes: 2496
Lines: 21

When I read the contributors to the French and Anglo-Saxon forums, when I 
read Einstein (three lines of explanation) or Poincaré (one line of 
explanation), I realize that it is very insufficient.
The theory of relativity is sorely lacking an article on the bases of the 
theory and the great problem of synchronization, that is to say the 
relations between space and time.
Einstein does not speak of the causes of the invariance of the speed of 
light, and he does not even explain that the measurement of the speed of 
light is in fact only a transversal decoy for a teletransverse observer.
What he does is just think and give a famous postulate, but written in 
haste, and without explanation. A postulate moreover taken once again from 
Poincaré.
All this is very insufficient.
It is urgent, I think, to rewrite an article, at least two pages long (and 
not three lines) on the very foundations of the theory.
The most difficult thing is not to understand things (I have a fairly 
clear understanding) but to write them in a simple and universal way, and 
especially by getting rid of this idea of ​​a FUCKING FLAT PLANE OF 
PRESENT TIME that clutters the thoughts of men from Methuselah to even 
today's physicists.

R.H.