Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Case Insensitive File Systems -- Torvalds Hates Them
Date: 2 Jun 2025 23:58:37 GMT
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <ma6s5dF2ds1U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <pan$4068a$3910f4f1$8cbecede$9e42905e@linux.rocks>
	<20250428080014.0000347f@gmail.com> <m79tdsF2bf6U1@mid.individual.net>
	<20250428111242.00007426@gmail.com>
	<pan$c046d$e87ef491$a3427b7a$ac576dbc@linux.rocks>
	<slrn1011nu8.46v.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <vurjl9$2pskn$1@dont-email.me>
	<slrn1013t50.1aev.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh>
	<vAGdnR-Fj9qGS4_1nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<slrn1016uic.2qk.rotflol2@geidiprime.bvh> <vv24n5$rjdd$1@dont-email.me>
	<jlchelx0p6.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <vv67ul$hbt1$14@dont-email.me>
	<101gt61$1s439$2@dont-email.me> <101j4nq$2udcb$2@dont-email.me>
	<101jq1q$36qt0$1@dont-email.me> <87v7pe54dl.fsf@atr2.ath.cx>
	<101lamu$3ijbt$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net Kv2kS89vNw+CkRUAg8Tb7wIMZs/PyNFX/TUhx8gwQqby2KHv7j
Cancel-Lock: sha1:I14hPJnTzunSTI9W4hOqpaSPpuw= sha256:NmN2dtDhHW/4mfYzgxLNB10ZRX6fLHkTPhd23tpJZBk=
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )

On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 00:05:02 +0100, Nuno Silva wrote:

> On 2025-06-02, jayjwa wrote:
> 
>> Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> writes:
>>
>>> I have never seen a Unicode-capable terminal myself, and, while I've
>>> not done much sampling, I doubt they're in any way common or frequent.
>> Xterm, foot, urxvt, konsole, xfce term....pretty much every modern
>> terminal.
> 
> (Do note that these - at least the ones whose names I recognize (I've
> never heard of one named "foot") - are terminal *emulators*, not
> terminals.)

Not many ADM-3As around anymore...