Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.1
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 08:38:15 +0200
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <ma7jf0F5rumU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <100keh4$2a7u2$1@dont-email.me> <100vs1t$1cm5u$1@dont-email.me>
 <BIycnSTIfO9FJa71nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
 <1010o80$1qbg5$1@dont-email.me> <1011u58$206dt$1@dont-email.me>
 <101hhpv$1vuss$1@dont-email.me>
 <n22dncRD94DA2aD1nZ2dnZfqnPrVd8-z@giganews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net 7jVlsyegrBHNO4/sjdvHAAwPvl0zRs7nA4Geza4HjM4nvccgZ8
Cancel-Lock: sha1:b8Om+t/G0SmtJetE3q5aWD8ALpI= sha256:DnradbcKRaMQDmSg5l/OR3iX6LFxjIa37LY0trUMxxs=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE, en-US
In-Reply-To: <n22dncRD94DA2aD1nZ2dnZfqnPrVd8-z@giganews.com>

Am Montag000002, 02.06.2025 um 08:27 schrieb Ross Finlayson:
> On 06/01/2025 05:41 AM, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>> On 26/05/2025 16:34, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>>> On 26/05/2025 05:47, Julio Di Egidio wrote:
>> <snip>
>>>> Coherence conditions is my best bet, as opposed to
>>>> everything goes, as that immediately makes no sense:
>>>> ultimately in a quantum mechanical form (information),
>>>> but already geometrically because *zero* (proper)
>>>> distance along a light-like path I take for serious:
>>>> zero distance is direct contact, and even sameness...
>>>
>>> # A coherence law for retro-causation: the observer.
>>>
>>> The observer from the future...
>>
>> "Decoherence as co-coherence."
>>
>> Consider the (Minkowski) space-time structure (which
>> is a mapping of our Universe), and project it onto the
>> (isochronous) space of a/"our" proper present: here we
>> have *decoherence*, as a loss of quantum information,
>> and a "collapse" to classical probabilities.  Kind of
>> a *co-holographic* principle.
>>
>> -Julio
>>
> 
> How is it, "merely a linear continuum", these three
> space dimensions and a ray of time?

There ain't no 'ray of time'.

Time behaves like an imaginary axis, if the axes of space are real.

Now the axis of time can be rotated, what makes new axes real, hence new 
spaces emerge from nothing (seemingly) if you would do that (rotate the 
axis of time).

TH
....