| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<maibtj93vbhl8u3pkjkfgd02kag2ahqmc2@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Job Offer Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 15:04:21 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 70 Message-ID: <maibtj93vbhl8u3pkjkfgd02kag2ahqmc2@4ax.com> References: <4GYAP.668109$_N6e.410994@fx17.iad> <vr1umv$1ssav$1@dont-email.me> <SK%AP.466888$SZca.338428@fx13.iad> <vr2qk3$2iae8$3@dont-email.me> <vr3v9f$3jhqv$2@dont-email.me> <vr4gje$e4h$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 20:04:24 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f59631549a514b03a5ea602cffddee25"; logging-data="133481"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18jmhuGQIoZgErX9oXIUN2e0GhbQSIwG/Y=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:m7p7BJzVMN9IXmXD218OS96NpYc= Bytes: 4178 On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 14:23:42 -0400, Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >On 3/15/2025 9:28 AM, AMuzi wrote: >> On 3/14/2025 10:02 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: >>> >>>>> If my department hiring committee were looking for a full time >>>>> professor, or if I were hiring a part timer, we'd reject anyone whose >>>>> communications included words like "elszwhere" or "arroused" or >>>>> "jnterviewing" OR "mowt orf." >>>> >>>> After all, there is nothing more important than correct spelling on a >>>> newsgroup. >>> >>> Most of us here handle that with barely a thought. >>> >>> John is always misspelling "college" as "collage" (which is an artwork >>> assembled from parts) and I've seen many people confuse "loose" and >>> "lose", but their mistakes are a tiny fraction of yours. >>> >>> It makes a person wonder whether you have very low standards, or >>> whether you're incapable of normal accuracy. Either possibility is >>> probably fatal for a job application. >>> >>> We'll see, I guess. Let us know when you're _actually_ working and >>> getting paid by this company. If you don't, we can discuss whether the >>> "offer" was only as real as the dent in your top tube, or whether they >>> ultimately rejected you. >>> >> >> While I do notice usage, grammar and spelling (I read the newspaper pen >> in hand) such as errant or superfluous apostrophes, who/whom, the all >> too common 'indexes' for 'indices' and so on, drawing attention to >> others' writing eccentricities is usually picayune and borders on snarky. >> >> Except when there's some shared humor to be found! > >I almost always ignore misspellings here. It does require a bit of self >control, because my work history makes the "correction" reflex strong. >Part of my job was to correct and grade student work, and I corrected >_all_ of it. Even for a solution to a mathematical problem, if a student >misspelled a word, I'd circle it. > >Note that I've never bothered to correct John's "collage" even though he >spells it that way every time. > >Vaguely related: Among the private emails Jobst and I traded, there were >two times he offered me advice on English sentence structure, when he >thought I could have expressed myself better. I was, shall we say, bemused. Years ago, a woman read one of my books, or at least part of one. She claimed to be a professional developmental/content editor and wanted permission to copy several pages of that book and edit if for free. Presumably to convince me to hire her At that point the book had been proofread and didn't need a proofreader/copy editor. He version added tons of what I call garbage content, including way too many descriptions of places and characters. I wasn't going to hire her anyway.... I want my stories to move fast. I do my best to follow Hemingway's advice... .....leave out unnecessary words and leave out information that the reader can figure out for themselves. -- C'est bon Soloman