Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <mailman.65.1709916072.3452.python-list@python.org>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<mailman.65.1709916072.3452.python-list@python.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: Variable scope inside and outside functions - global statement
 being overridden by assignation unless preceded by reference
Date: Fri,  8 Mar 2024 11:41:10 -0500 (EST)
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <mailman.65.1709916072.3452.python-list@python.org>
References: <bd2e0672-fc3e-4678-b212-04ab1f45c52c@gmail.com>
 <ZepEKCbZNelFasml@cskk.homeip.net> <4Trnb856LRznVF4@mail.python.org>
 <CAPTjJmqg4AwHpMLZqteK-qiRZwzDoUCLAFvYGku1X4H2f6b_RA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4TrsPL1jK7znV1q@mail.python.org>
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 0JTSpDmF+1iou4UM7fm6CAB/yli2WHlyHnz6uic0uB9Q==
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tAkv8WfwMSC8pK10hGkLxwXWvOc= sha256:Dclg5+b+4arXzPeIsA7Pd+9Q+zkkQ70tPfRxh62dgkk=
Return-Path: <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
Authentication-Results: mail.python.org; dkim=none reason="no signature";
 dkim-adsp=none (unprotected policy); dkim-atps=neutral
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.021
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'mar': 0.07; 'space,':
 0.07; 'angelico': 0.09; 'binding': 0.09; '2024': 0.16; 'bindings':
 0.16; 'from:addr:grant.b.edwards': 0.16; 'from:name:grant
 edwards': 0.16; 'question,': 0.16; 'subject:being': 0.16;
 'subject:reference': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'grant': 0.17;
 'probably': 0.17; "aren't": 0.19; 'name.': 0.19; 'to:addr:python-
 list': 0.20; 'sat,': 0.22; "isn't": 0.27; 'else': 0.27; 'chris':
 0.28; 'sense': 0.28; 'computer': 0.29; 'header:User-Agent:1':
 0.30; 'program': 0.31; "doesn't": 0.32; 'python-list': 0.32;
 'but': 0.32; 'there': 0.33; 'same': 0.34; 'running': 0.34;
 'from:addr:gmail.com': 0.35; 'source': 0.36; "it's": 0.37;
 'single': 0.39; 'limited': 0.62; 'message-id:invalid': 0.68;
 'within': 0.69; 'global': 0.73; 'bias': 0.76; 'choice': 0.76;
 'left': 0.83; 'global.': 0.84; 'scope': 0.84; 'subject: \n ': 0.84
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language
 <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>,
 <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>,
 <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <4TrsPL1jK7znV1q@mail.python.org>
X-Mailman-Original-References: <bd2e0672-fc3e-4678-b212-04ab1f45c52c@gmail.com>
 <ZepEKCbZNelFasml@cskk.homeip.net> <4Trnb856LRznVF4@mail.python.org>
 <CAPTjJmqg4AwHpMLZqteK-qiRZwzDoUCLAFvYGku1X4H2f6b_RA@mail.gmail.com>
Bytes: 3964

On 2024-03-08, Chris Angelico via Python-list <python-list@python.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 at 00:51, Grant Edwards via Python-list
><python-list@python.org> wrote:
>
>> One might argue that "global" isn't a good choice for what to call the
>> scope in question, since it's not global. It's limited to that source
>> file. It doesn't make sense to me to call a binding "global", when
>> there can be multile different "global" bindings of the same name.
>
> Most "globals" aren't global either, since you can have different
> globals in different running applications.

To me, "global" has always been limited to within a single
process/address space, but that's probably just bias left over from
C/Pascal/FORTRAN/assembly/etc. It never occurred to me that a global
called "X" in one program on one computer would be the same as a
global called "X" in a different program on a different computer
somewhere else on the "globe".