Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.math
Subject: Re: What is a photon
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 06:26:14 +0200
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <mav333Fda1gU4@mid.individual.net>
References: <9af3e95b721801ec23446e0d70f081b3@www.novabbs.org>
 <%5W_P.1199819$lZjd.237071@fx05.ams4> <101hdi1$2104j$1@dont-email.me>
 <3fe4ff53feee25131897dec6bed26616@www.novabbs.com>
 <101mlhj$3v6bs$1@dont-email.me>
 <b3c79148a2a73e05267102dc02069b51@www.novabbs.org>
 <101pe06$qdb4$1@dont-email.me>
 <bf5db4fb77db2aa5d2d1d9ec07759e2d@www.novabbs.org>
 <man762F2uddU1@mid.individual.net>
 <7684219ed9fcb7ee269061c10326c92d@www.novabbs.org>
 <masienFtss3U2@mid.individual.net> <102cvd1$27tbr$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net Mx0Q+nnjF5h2TqcsX+vY0QmahHIVJkq3Q3HPICrluEgXi84ju8
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KO0/rZmLepcE3YlxnkoYRQuEssA= sha256:EtzR/m8d+ps9TTmN8muUP68sfZ/VxfupraLHB1gVRME=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE, en-US
In-Reply-To: <102cvd1$27tbr$1@dont-email.me>

Am Donnerstag000012, 12.06.2025 um 00:19 schrieb Laurence Vassilikos:
> Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
>> I call this scheme 'subjectivism', which means: if all observers are of
>> equal rights, than all possible observers need to observe a different
>> world. And all observers observe necessarily from their own position.
> 
> no, that's called 'objectivism'

No, because I had called that schema 'subjectivism'.

(whether you do or anybody else, that is not my concern)

The idea behind this name is my aim, to make possible, that all 
observers are of equal rights.

Since there exist billions of observers of our own species alone, we had 
to allow an enormous amount of different views upon the world.

But, on the other hand, that's not at all bad, because we usually see 
the world like this.

This is actually exactly how we see the world, because
'to see' requires the use of our own eyes and our own brain.

These things (eyes and brain) are inevitably 'subjective', because one's 
brain and eyes belong to that person.

'Objectivism', on the other hand, would require, what isn't possible:

kind of 'collective' brain and eyes.

Therefore I had regarded subjectivism as system we actually use, because 
we have no other means.

But 'subjectivism' gives a satisfying explanation, why we see things 
like we see them:

because we are always somewhere and can only see the world from there.


TH