Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: What is a photon
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 09:07:31 +0200
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <mb4l9eFbgviU4@mid.individual.net>
References: <9af3e95b721801ec23446e0d70f081b3@www.novabbs.org>
 <%5W_P.1199819$lZjd.237071@fx05.ams4> <101hdi1$2104j$1@dont-email.me>
 <3fe4ff53feee25131897dec6bed26616@www.novabbs.com>
 <101mlhj$3v6bs$1@dont-email.me>
 <b3c79148a2a73e05267102dc02069b51@www.novabbs.org>
 <101pe06$qdb4$1@dont-email.me>
 <bf5db4fb77db2aa5d2d1d9ec07759e2d@www.novabbs.org>
 <man762F2uddU1@mid.individual.net>
 <7684219ed9fcb7ee269061c10326c92d@www.novabbs.org>
 <masienFtss3U2@mid.individual.net>
 <1rdrgdh.1myz65p1yygjrzN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
 <mav29hFda1gU3@mid.individual.net> <102f8cr$2rudm$1@dont-email.me>
 <mb24q3Fsa2uU12@mid.individual.net> <102hq63$3je3f$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net qtx+B5e2n4zCgvXkorp+WAlniBMaWXOQ2Ted37hqpdFHEm0PiV
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MIFjEXK3Pb5dqyi3h66M293o8Ws= sha256:/k9EZ6s8RbJgwizURBYnrhlQuUGLl1WARyuULn1NxEE=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <102hq63$3je3f$1@dont-email.me>

Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 20:27 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
> Den 13.06.2025 10:13, skrev Thomas Heger:
>>
>> I meant, that 'speed of light' is actually an angle.
>>
>> This angle is measured locally as velocity c.
>>
>> In geometric terms it would be 45° and means the equality of two 
>> complex intervals called 'timelike' and 'spacelike'.
>>
>> For any 'influence' (all sorts of interactions in a certain space with 
>> complex valued 'points', called 'spacetime') which fulfills this 
>> condition, we could use the term 'light speed'.
>>
>> Now light falls into this cathegory as other em-waves, too.
>>
>> Now we need to attatch an axis of time to any location and place the 
>> observer in the center of its local frame of reference, we could see, 
>> that the past light-cone of the observer is using this angle c, while 
>> the opposite means 'standstill' (actually 'relative standstill' in 
>> respect to the observer).
>>
>> Now I called the comoving patters 'matter' and the inverse 'axis of 
>> time', hence matter and time are 'relative', too.
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>> TH
> 
> 
> I, the reader, don't understand this text, which according
> to Thomas Heger is the author's fault.

No, to understand is the problem of the reader.

The author's fault would be, if the text cannot be understood.


> So could you please write an annotated version of this text,
> where you point out the errors that make me fail to understand it?
>
sure

Please have a look at my 'book':


https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing


TH