Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: What's the actual *advantage* of not having an sd slot?
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 19:42:04 +0200
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <mbb3bbFe5gkU4@mid.individual.net>
References: <102mrt3$18oa$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <102n0nd$11tpt$1@dont-email.me>
 <102n1oc$17n1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <mb8l2hF1k8mU2@mid.individual.net>
 <102oj6s$41r$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 1mU1JpbyjG/ERc6n18XBnAg+ZBPzm5Jm1ZW1nuW0MfrY2HdR5+
Cancel-Lock: sha1:S+HVeNAg//JoL3QUx2fnmgJerGo= sha256:6eqDsQXhlVceP4YPx2yvHLV1SOIgHjA8pvAZgXuWkuI=
Content-Language: en-US, de-DE
In-Reply-To: <102oj6s$41r$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>

Marion, 2025-06-16 10:04:

> On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 21:26:10 +0200, Arno Welzel wrote :
[...]
>> Well - when I have 128 or 256 GB memory built in to a phone, I don't
>> have to replace anything. It is just there.
> 
> Heh heh heh... That's the whole point!
> 
> You got fleeced.
> And you don't even realize you were fleeced.
> 
> You're a whale.
> Even so, you *still* lost functionality with your crappy phone, Arno.

Nope. I don't need that functionality - no matter, how often you try to
repeat that.

> As far as anyone has stated so far, it is *impossible* for you to replace
> the functionality you lost by buying that crappy phone.

Well - I don't care, I don't need that functionality anyway. And when
one day a phone will provide 1 TB of memory - I will get buy it. And
yes, this day will come. There are already device with 512 GB internal
memory available.

[...]
> Explain to all of us how you can replace the lost functionality?

Why should I replace anything? It works as it is.

[...]
>> For me it is an adavantage to have internal memory which can be accessed
>> with 200-300 MB/s compared to just 10-20 MB/s which is usually provided
>> by SD cards. 
> 
> OK. The speed is important. That's a valid point. I will NEVER disagree
> with anyone (even an Apple troll) who makes a logically sensible point.
> 
> Yes. The data you store on an sd card (typically photos & videos) are
> accessed much slower than if you stored that same data in internal memory.
> 
> How much of a difference does it make?

For me - a lot. I can see that every time, when FolderSync synchronizes
*ALL* data with *MY OWN*  server!

> I do not know.
> 
> Do you?

Yes.



-- 
Arno Welzel
https://arnowelzel.de