Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<mc2tp9Ff9t2U1@mid.individual.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Now Hear This. This Group Is Linux Advocacy.
Date: 25 Jun 2025 18:34:18 GMT
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <mc2tp9Ff9t2U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <pan$658e7$817287a7$4b910a0c$ff9c693d@gnu.rocks>
	<103c9f3$1eno7$2@dont-email.me> <mbtpu4Fk39bU1@mid.individual.net>
	<103etbl$26rtk$2@dont-email.me> <103gdtp$2lluh$6@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net f5n/i8Gt/O8/NFe70mNOeQ3TTt96xUbPuJbtsZDECj5L9hJczZ
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9ahKsS6R1cWET1yLMQhCx6FyAzI= sha256:e8/T73Mfbg+XVXMtIF2146LEgmW3ZxLhdj3Cvwa9w84=
User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )

On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 09:01:45 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 15:12:53 -0400, -hh wrote:
> 
>> IIRC, the common appeal of the kit airplanes was because of their much
>> lower purchase price.  Apparently, much of the cost savings is because
>> of lower liability insurance overhead:  in the event of aircraft
>> failure, the kit company is able to pass it off on the DIY assembler.
> 
> Remember how John Denver died?

The plane didn't fail. The original builder put the fuel selector in a 
strange place that was difficult to reach and Denver didn't refuel since 
he didn't plan to be up that long. His contortions trying to reach the 
selector may have contributed.