Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: prd@pauldormer.cix.co.uk (Paul Dormer)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.fandom
Subject: Re: MT VOID, 05/17/24 -- Vol. 42, No. 46, Whole Number 2328
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 10:58 +0100 (BST)
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <memo.20240521105813.6288B@pauldormer.cix.co.uk>
References: <v2hbbr$esr8$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: prd@pauldormer.cix.co.uk
X-Trace: individual.net zX1v0oBDqyjsmSh+qb1Z3wGn6M4wWEaoi6JjgeosFKsZvsGqIb
Cancel-Lock: sha1:S4quPXPmzKcCN2wHZqbf3Z88c/Y= sha256:WVjWX3GWi/LQJFNEJnST32eJXdF6v5AF7ELDLlZQLrY=
X-News-Software: Ameol
X-URL: http://cix.uk
Bytes: 1042

In article <v2hbbr$esr8$1@dont-email.me>, petertrei@gmail.com
(Cryptoengineer) wrote:

> 
> The sixties were 60 years ago. How long ago does something have to be 
> to be able to say 'latter-day' for a new incarnation?

I missed out from my previous post that the film in question was from
1956, about eight years before Mary Whitehouse's rise to prominence.