Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<memo.20240818192128.19028F@jgd.cix.co.uk> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: jgd@cix.co.uk (John Dallman) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 19:21 +0100 (BST) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 20 Message-ID: <memo.20240818192128.19028F@jgd.cix.co.uk> References: <v9t3ih$2e8ee$1@dont-email.me> Reply-To: jgd@cix.co.uk Injection-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 20:21:29 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e1d74216f663632be9581f17faf1be3e"; logging-data="2616122"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX181BUc+cRwADr4uo1pZs3QHCwjsNTZ/V/8=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:ASCQIhyHPDH4RP9I10pUgryOV9w= X-Clacks-Overhead-header: GNU Terry Pratchett Bytes: 1785 In article <v9t3ih$2e8ee$1@dont-email.me>, OrangeFish@invalid.invalid (OrangeFish) wrote: > An interesting comment on the learning curve (and I know nothing > about COBOL) given the story that the language was created to allow > non-programmers to programme. It doesn't require learning concepts that are strange to accountants or bookkeepers. Just about all of its keywords are ordinary English words being used in something like their normal sense. It's much easier for business people to learn than assembler, which is what it was intended to replace. However, it has a /lot/ of keywords and is generally verbose, the rules on combining keywords are a bit weird, and it lacks "expressive power" - trying to get it to deal with data types that aren't built into it is kind of hard. I had a basic COBOL course at college in 1980-81, and became quite clear that this wasn't what I wanted to do. John