Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: ABC settles "rape" claim re: Pres. Elect.
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 07:36:21 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 82
Message-ID: <mkalmjd3oij37ftqlp7pla8k83ir1js8tk@4ax.com>
References: <BPWcnY5y78tvh_76nZ2dnZfqn_QAAAAA@giganews.com> <vjvt1r$2holo$1@dont-email.me> <7g48mj9e1lq6b2qi5pjufskcb1osrcrfpk@4ax.com> <vk1kk0$2uqie$2@dont-email.me> <vtmamjtdjqj1mgnohckh8l0v6f9d3iqn34@4ax.com> <vk4bun$3ifl6$3@dont-email.me> <96ndmj99a7t8mjdk55qmuq292qo0qs7hiu@4ax.com> <vk6qb3$4akb$3@dont-email.me> <dsbgmj5suk451l2ke21kh7q274ev8hj20t@4ax.com> <vk9l9f$nssq$3@dont-email.me> <filimj9b52ainksqpu4jp2109kelb1rgj9@4ax.com> <vkc3v4$19n3s$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 13:36:24 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fbcb2b13b634226edbfce4d565bc1b81";
	logging-data="1947787"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18x08tHlFXOferfQchFyfwdHJ75g2LOUH8="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:e2shrIv9RQQKtpx8F8AcDrG73ws=
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 241224-2, 12/24/2024), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 4613

On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 11:43:15 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:

>On 12/23/2024 7:24 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 13:20:30 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 12/22/2024 10:26 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:28:18 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/21/2024 10:21 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:10:29 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/20/2024 6:59 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:19:59 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 12/19/2024 7:31 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:31:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
>>>>>>>>>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2024 4:28 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:57:19 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . . .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your President-elect forcibly finger fucked her.  Explain *that* fact.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump was not convicted of rape.  ABC said he was.  They lied.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> End of story.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other jurisdictions it's considered rape/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But he wasn't in other jurisdictions.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The harm to Donald Trump wws nominal. not $15 million worth.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ABC obviously felt otherwise given that they caved so quickly.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Umm... giant corporations don't piss off sitting Presidents, especially
>>>>>>>>> not one who's vengeance-driven.  It's bad business.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Enough about Biden.  What about Trump?  BTW Trump is not yet the
>>>>>>>> sitting President and it never stopped the media before so your claim
>>>>>>>> is ridiculous.  ABC was caught in libel and paid big time.  End of
>>>>>>>> story.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not the "end of story" just because you stop reading.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're welcome to explain it us how a jury finding Trump not guilty of
>>>>>> rape makes him guilty of it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Laugher.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's legal guilt, and then there's understood guilt.  Trump escapes
>>>>> the former only by a specific distinction in a specific jurisdiction.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Good grief.  You can't state that someone was convicted of rape when
>>>> they weren't.  That's libel.
>>>
>>> Yes, if you knew they weren't.  And iirc he said "found *liable* for
>>> rape", not "convicted" ...which may have been raised as relevant.
>>>
>> 
>> Are you now trying to say that Boy George gave an interview without
>> doing his homework?
>
>No, as I understand it, his homework was even done *for* him.  But he 
>chose to describe Trump as harshly as possible.  It's unclear what 
>verdict a full reckoning -- i.e., no "settlement" -- would've given.
>

To state that he was convicted of rape is not a description.  It's a
claim of fact, which is why ABC is paying big bucks.