Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: DOJ is correct that Apple iPhone is far less secure than Android
 when RCS messaging is involved
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 13:35:50 +0200
Lines: 55
Message-ID: <mluhfkx1a8.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
References: <uud0lh$13jd4$1@paganini.bofh.team> <uukmmf$6op7$1@dont-email.me>
 <uuks3l$7ss7$1@dont-email.me> <uuktv2$88f6$1@dont-email.me>
 <uul0n2$ciq7$1@dont-email.me> <uulbg4$22k53$1@news.mixmin.net>
 <uuttdi$2o2ua$1@dont-email.me> <uv500e$3d51p$2@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv5j4u$rkil$1@dont-email.me> <uv7ldo$3kigb$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uv95uq$1q4ch$1@dont-email.me> <uva7qt$3r9oj$3@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvb8t1$2bs3g$1@dont-email.me> <uvfp97$9dr7$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvg7vq$3imu5$1@dont-email.me> <uvi5j8$f8km$5@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvjt1m$eih9$1@dont-email.me> <uvl18e$mdmk$3@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvl6vg$qd7i$1@dont-email.me> <uvum7e$1eigo$3@news.mixmin.net>
 <uvv1dh$39521$1@dont-email.me> <v024tm$1mmr6$2@news.mixmin.net>
 <v02sgt$976r$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net gMp/R1uv3mNyd9Fo/x/z5wfbDvzNdGfmATZ4AuD47SCR++ig4k
X-Orig-Path: Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cZFSQ/EdrqfVdFR/0rOGRg88klA= sha256:tj3Ie/PB1bKKCIkxc0+CRx6fJFEiYHmuGG8XgStactY=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: es-ES, en-CA
In-Reply-To: <v02sgt$976r$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3404

On 2024-04-21 13:15, Chris wrote:
> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>> Chris wrote:
>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Chris wrote:
>>>>>>> Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Chris wrote:

....

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are countless laws that literally invent crimes and proscribe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> punishments when there is no concrete harm being done to anyone or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Countless, really? Examples.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Notable you didn't answer this.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> All laws that punish mere possession of firearms by peaceable men, for one,
>>>>>>>>>> if you really want to get into that debate.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why do "peaceable men" need to have a gun? In modern society there's no
>>>>>>>>> need for anyone to be carrying guns. It's just boys pretending to be men.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Because bad and evil men exist. This isn't changed by modern society.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No one needs vigilantes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Self-defense is not vigilantism.
>>>>>
>>>>> Pre-empirically carrying a gun is not "self-defence".
>>>>
>>>> Yes it is.
>>>
>>> Nope. It's a pre-meditated act. You're armed with the intention to harm.
>>>
>>
>> Those in the United States who lawfully carry a concealed handgun
>> hope they never need to use it, but want to be prepared for that
>> eventuality.
> 
> Why? I've been to the US. It isn't as lawless you make out.
> 
> As a visitor I'm more worried about getting caught in cross-fire than
> actually being a victim of crime.
> 


Or stepping somewhere and being shot as trespasser :-D

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.