| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<mn.3d3d7e92a49268d6.119180@invalid.pasdepub> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patriotism.KMA> Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh Subject: Re: Stupid Republicans Pushing Family Values and Religion Will Solve Gun Violence Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2022 19:41:38 -0400 Organization: Laughing at liberals wearing masks Lines: 37 Message-ID: <oncvah1bpg4gu47ho5768ldkfsv84rn996@4ax.com> References: <t82mmr$brs$1@dont-email.me> <XnsAEB38A3B3A036noemailcomcastnet@216.166.97.131> <t82q5k$fu0$1@dont-email.me> <XnsAEB3D44DB6BAnoemailcomcastnet@216.166.97.131> <t85bgl$a1u$1@dont-email.me> <t8jkvg$1p5$1@dont-email.me> <t8ke1a$59l$3@dont-email.me> <chine.bleu-02DBA2.07234518062022@news.eternal-september.org> <t8kt1f$e1f$3@dont-email.me> <XnsAEBA8B9C24C0Cnoemailcomcastnet@216.166.97.131> <rc5vahhlgr2ik0i64f7s7vo3u01l2t3q7q@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="cf78d227a20779d6a7cba5cf9cffdb04"; logging-data="19869"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+QFvOz2fplTqs9Z6RHf8YAAohjpbrWhVk=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:TJGs7TruV6jdE0J7Ng5i+2XrSrw= Bytes: 2537 On Sun, 19 Jun 2022 17:33:24 -0400, governor.swill@gmail.com wrote: >On Sat, 18 Jun 2022 13:54:23 -0500, Mitchell Holman ><noemail@verizon.net> wrote: > >>Yak <yak@inbox.com> wrote in news:t8kt1f$e1f$3@dont-email.me: >> >>> On 6/18/22 10:23 AM, Siri Cruise wrote: > >>>> Is Rittenhouse a good guy with a gun? >>> >>> Yes. >>> >>>> What bad guy with a gun did >>>> he stop? >>> >>> They guys that tried to kill him as he was exercising a constitutional >>> right. It's sad that you hate the constitution and America that much. >>> >>> >> >> He carries a gun he is not >>allowed to carry into demonstration >>to protect property he doesn't own? His gun was legal.. >Exactly. He went out in public, well armed claiming he was there to >protect other people's property. Because he put himself in a >dangerous situation deliberately, one that didn't affect his home or >loved ones, he should be charged with murder. <LOL> You think it should be against the law to defend other people and their property? Wouldn't that make all the body guards and security people illegal? >Swill