Article <musi1jhm09745v4es6ca1pbc4nmogs42ck@4ax.com>

Deutsch English Français Italiano
<musi1jhm09745v4es6ca1pbc4nmogs42ck@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.xcski.com!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: Vincent Maycock <maycock@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: West Virginia creationism
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:04:15 -0700
Organization: University of Ediacara
Lines: 54
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <musi1jhm09745v4es6ca1pbc4nmogs42ck@4ax.com>
References: <cBYNN.132676$GX69.32667@fx46.iad> <66ad07ee-b140-4518-a9df-bffa316b7391@gmail.com> <9OZNN.758376$p%Mb.330094@fx15.iad> <f43i0jh8u89nlndn5137sfa0uo7b0isoik@4ax.com> <8a_ON.491226$yEgf.384550@fx09.iad> <gdop0jt4mvqljioufv7stmefniid401svh@4ax.com> <CvnRN.140988$6ePe.119511@fx42.iad> <rcpd1jtljvngh3g3s7455lun0ukjlrqoeb@4ax.com> <2VYRN.256204$hN14.193303@fx17.iad> <4fch1jpp5qtolug4bj158sl9tvn8h7htp9@4ax.com> <ZudSN.257840$hN14.25285@fx17.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="2636"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Bytes: 5471

On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 12:41:29 -0400, Ron Dean
<rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:

<snip>
>In the most cases where adaptations and minor evolutionary changes are 
>observed it's not because new information is added to DNA, but rather 
>there is a loss of information.
>
>https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-57694-8
>
>Bad mutations seems to be the rule.

*Most* mutations are harmful, but to disprove evolution you need to
show that *all*  mutations are harmful -- those rare beneficial
mutations can be selected by and amplified through natural selection,
resulting in better-functioning organisms.

> The male sperm count is decreasing 
>with each generation. Each year new and previously unknown genetic 
>diseases are occurring just in humans. With the passing of time, there 
>is little doubt that our DNA, our genetics is become increasingly _less_ 
>perfect. The Homo-sapiens species is believed to have arrived on the 
>scene 200,000 years ago, given the increases in genetic disorders we 
>observe today, it's highly _likely_ that the DNA of our early ancestors 
>were far closer to perfect that any of their decedents. Therefore, from 
>this evidence one can deduce that the proofreading and repair mechanisms 
>themselves are in a declining state with each generation becoming a bit 
>less perfect than the preceding generation. It's possible we saw this in 
>the extinction of Neanderthal species.
>
>Beneficial mutations are rarely observed. The defective mutations are 
>overwhelming the beneficial mutations, as evidenced by the increasing 
>list of genetic disorders. Perhaps, this explains the 99% extinction 
>rate of all life forms that ever lived as observed or recorded in the 
>fossil record, as well as the numbers of the species become extinct 
>today. of course, human involvement accounts for some of this extinction 
>such as passenger pigeons, the dodo bird and the Tasmanian tiger. But to 
>your point the proofreading and repair systems are not perfect. But 
>without deliberate design how did the proofreading and repair systems 
>come about in the first place? 

Obviously, because something that helps something replicate itself
better is going to leave more copies of itself in the gene pool .


>  Of course there is educated, guesses, 
>suppositions, hypothesis and theories, but no one _knows_.

Do you consider your Intelligent Design argument to be an educated
guess, or a supposition?  And is there anything wrong with being a
hypothesis or theory? 
 
>question is where is the man holding hold Occam sword? Has he been 
>barred from entering this room of science?